1211011 Informal Interpretation



Michael Verne

UPDATE February 16, 2017: For clarification, the PNO's current position is that the repayment of debt may be deducted from the acquisition price only where the debt is held by, or secured by, Target. 

– Agree. K Walsh concurs.


From: (Redacted)
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 7:51 PM
To: Verne, B. Michael; Walsh, Kathryn
Cc: (Redacted)
Subject: HSR Question re Use of Proceeds to Pay Down Debt of Parent

November19, 2012

R.Michael Verne & Kathryn Walsh, Esq.
Federal Trade Commission
Premerger Notification Office
601 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, DC 20580

Re:HSR Question re Use of Proceeds to Pay Down Debt of Parent

DearMr. Verne and Ms. Walsh:

Iam writing to seek confirmation that Informal Opinion 0805010 (http://ftc.gov/bc/hsr/informal/opinions/0805010.htm) still reflects the view of the PNO. In the instant transaction, S is the UPEof several wholly-owned subsidiaries ("T1 entities") some of whichhave wholly-owned subsidiaries of their own ("T2 entities"). S owesdebt to third-parties, and the sale of T1 or T2 entities would be a defaultevent under the debt covenants. In the instant transaction, A will purchasesome of the T1 and T2 entities. Some or all of the proceeds of sale will beused to repay S's debt. I understand that, based on 0805010, we should excludefrom the "acquisition price" for purposes of determining thetransaction value that portion of the proceeds from the sale of the votingsecurities or non-corporate interests of the T1 and T2 entities that is used torepay the debt of S.

About Informal Interpretations

Informal interpretations provide guidance from previous staff interpretations on the applicability of the HSR rules to specific fact situations. You should not rely on them as a substitute for reading the Act and the Rules themselves. These materials do not, and are not intended to, constitute legal advice.

Learn more about Informal Interpretations.