The legal library gives you easy access to the FTC’s case information and other official legal, policy, and guidance documents.
20200335: Acerinox S.A.; Lindsay Goldberg IV, L.P.
20200337: Arbor Investments IV, L.P.; The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.
20200346: LCI Industries; Audax Private Equity Fund IV, L.P.
20200089: Thoma Bravo Fund XIII-A, L.P.; XIO Platinum LP
Federal Trade Commission's Statement of Public Interest
20200283: Preservation Freehold Company; John F. Taylor
20200289: HMS Holdings Corp.; AP VIII Olympus VoteCo, LLC
20200326: Trident VII, L.P.; PHR Holding Company, L.P.
20200332: ACON Equity Partners IV, L.P.; Saw Mill Capital Partners, LP
20200333: Chicago Pacific Founders Fund II,LP; Andrew Smith
20200334: Chicago Pacific Founders Fund II,LP; Peter Smith
FTC Comment to Texas Medical Board on Its Proposed Rule 193.13 to Add Supervision Requirements for Texas-Certified Nurse Anesthetists
Statement of Commissioner Rohit Chopra In the Matter of the University of Phoenix, Inc.
Concurring Statement of Commissioner Rebecca Kelly Slaughter In the Matter of the University of Phoenix, Inc.
UrthBox, Inc., In the Matter of
According to the agency’s April 2019 complaint, UrthBox violated the FTC Act by misrepresenting that positive consumer reviews on the BBB’s and other websites reflected the independent experiences or opinions of impartial consumers, while the reviewers actually had a material connection to the company. The FTC alleged that UrthBox did not adequately disclose that some consumers received compensation, including free snack boxes, to post those positive reviews. The final order settling the FTC’s charges bars the respondents from engaging in similar conduct and requires them to pay $100,000 to the FTC. In December 2019, the FTC returned more than $84,000 to compensate consumers charged after signing up for the trial offer.