The legal library gives you easy access to the FTC’s case information and other official legal, policy, and guidance documents.
Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al. v. Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al.
20170147: Hainan Cihang Charitable Foundation; CIT Group Inc.
20170157: H.I.G. Middle Market LBO Fund II, L.P.; Mercury Capital, L.P.
20170026: Francisco Partners IV, L.P.; Eric and Amy Huang Legacy Trust u/a 9/30/11
20170084: Equistone V FPCI; Wayzata Opportunities Fund II, L.P.
20170126: Kayne Anderson Energy Fund VI, L.P.; RSP Permian, Inc.
20170127: Kayne Anderson Energy Fund VII, L.P.; RSP Permian, Inc.
16110001 Informal Interpretation
16110002 Informal Interpretation
20161726: Berry Plastics Group, Inc.; AEP Industries Inc.
20170013: B&G Foods, Inc.; The Garfield Weston Charitable Foundation
20161847: Windjammer Senior Equity Fund IV, L.P.; Advanced Instruments, Inc.
Caledonia Investments plc
Investment trust Caledonia Investments plc agreed to pay $480,000 in civil penalties to resolve charges that it violated federal premerger reporting laws by failing to report its purchase in 2014 of voting shares in the helicopter services company Bristow Group, Inc. According to the complaint, in June 2008, Caledonia first acquired voting shares in Bristow and reported its purchase to U.S. antitrust authorities, as required under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act. Subsequently, Caledonia made additional purchases that were exempt from reporting under HSR rules. During that same timeframe, however, two Caledonia employees were designated to serve on Bristow’s board. Bristow awards restricted-stock voting securities to its board members, and by agreement, it set aside the securities for the two Caledonia board members for purchase by Caledonia. In February 2014, these voting shares vested, and Caledonia acquired them, according to the complaint. The Commission charged that Caledonia was required under the HSR Act to report this purchase but failed to do so. The HSR Act allows a company that has reported an initial purchase of voting shares to purchase additional voting shares from the same issuer – as long as those purchases do not cause the company’s total holdings to cross a higher reporting threshold over a five-year period following the initial purchase. The complaint charges that Caledonia’s 2014 purchase of voting shares in Bristow fell outside the five-year period following its initial purchase.