Skip to main content
Date

Tags:

Rule
801.10
Staff
Kristin Shaffer
Response/Comments

If there is a reasonable basis for estimating the contingent portion(s) of the consideration, then the acquisition price can be determined.  If, however, the contingent portion(s) is/are too speculative, then the buyer must determine the FMV.  See PNPM 54, 55.   The mark-up should not be counted as additional consideration.

Question

[REDACTED]

If there is a reasonable basis for estimating the contingent portion(s) of the consideration, then the acquisition price can be determined.  If, however, the contingent portion(s) is/are too speculative, then the buyer must determine the FMV.  See PNPM 54, 55.   The mark-up should not be counted as additional consideration.

Best regards,

Kristin

 _______________________________

Kristin Shaffer

Attorney

Premerger Notification Office

Federal Trade Commission

202-326-3434 | kshaffer@ftc.gov

 

From: [REDACTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2016 4:21 PM
To: Walsh, Kathryn E.
Cc: [REDACTED]
Subject: RE: HSR Question

 

Hi Kate,

I have a question as to how to value a potential asset transaction. Assume that company A is selling its assets (regulatory files, applications and approvals,  IP, including technology know-how and specific trademarks, tradenames and goodwill) for a non-patented product (the "Product") to company B. Company B will pay as consideration $10m upfront, a contingent $10 milestone payment and royalties based on worldwide sales for 10 years. In addition, for 4 years, company A will act as a toll manufacturer of the Product while company B completes technology transfer and regulatory approvals. In addition for 4 years, Company B will purchase a related product from  company A. Company B will pay company A a 15% mark-up on its COGS for the toll manufacturing and the other product.

  1. As to the $10m upfront, the $10 milestone payment and royalties, I understand that this consideration is "undetermined" and the buyer must make a good faith valuation 60 days before filing or closing.
  2. My question is whether the 15% mark-up for COGS should be considered additional consideration to include in the valuation of the size of the transaction.

Thanks,

[REDACTED]

About Informal Interpretations

Informal interpretations provide guidance from PNO staff on the applicability of the HSR rules to specific fact situations. They do not necessarily reflect the position of the Commission. You should not rely on them as a substitute for reading the Act and the Rules themselves. These materials do not, and are not intended to, constitute legal advice. 

Learn more about Informal Interpretations.