The legal library gives you easy access to the FTC’s case information and other official legal, policy, and guidance documents.
20131181: Trian Partners Strategic Investment Fund II, L.P.; E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
20131223: Parametric Sound Corporation; VTB Holdings, Inc.
20131187: CareGroup, Inc.; The Jordan Health Systems, Inc.
1309001 Informal Interpretation
20131227: Pianissimo Holdings Corp.; Steinway Musical Instruments, Inc.
1308003 Informal Interpretation
The Money Services Round Table
20131136: Cisco Systems, Inc.; Sourcefire, Inc.
20131211: Ronald O. Perelman; Beauty Care Professional Products Participations, S.A.
20131205: David H. Murdock; Dole Food Company, Inc.
20131212: Rockwool International A/S; CMC Family Holdings LLC
20131084: Boston Scientific Corporation; C.R. Bard, Inc.
20131199: Platinum Equity Capital Partners III, L.P.; JPMorgan Chase & Co.
20131210: Eurasian Resources Group; Eurasian Natural Resources Corporation PLC
20131218: Mr. John W. Henry; The New York Times Company
20131189: Vahid David Delrahim; Sally Anenberg
20131208: AOT Building Products LP; CPG International Holdings LP
Nwabueze v. AT&T, Inc.
General Electric Company, In the Matter of
The FTC charged that GE’s proposed acquisition of Avio would substantially lessen competition in the sale of engines for the A320neo aircraft, which would result in higher prices, reduced quality, and engine delivery delays for A320neo customers. GE -- through CFM International, its joint venture with France’s Snecma S.A. -- and Pratt & Whitney are the only two firms that manufacture engines for Airbus’s A320neo aircraft. Avio designs a critical component -- the accessory gearbox or AGB -- for Pratt & Whitney’s PW1100G engine. Pratt & Whitney has no viable alternatives to Avio for development of the AGB for the PW1100G engine. According to the FTC, GE's acquisition of Avio would give GE the ability and incentive to disrupt the design and certification of Avio’s AGB for the PW1100G engine used on A320neo aircraft. The FTC order remedies the acquisition’s likely anticompetitive effects by removing GE’s ability and incentive to disrupt Avio’s AGB work during the design, certification, and initial production ramp-up phase