8310009 Informal Interpretation

Date:
Rule:
7A(c)(5)
Staff:
Wayne Kaplan

Question

(redacted)

October 26, 1983

Re:Premerger Notification Requirements
Under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust
Improvements Act of 1976
Transaction Number: (redacted)

Dear Mr. Kaplan:

This is to notify you that the transaction between (redacted) has been consummated by the parties.

In connection with your letter dated October 14, 1983, please note that the reference in the second sentence of your letter to Section 7A(c)(5) of the Clayton Act is correct, but the cross-reference to 15 U.S.C. should be to Section 18a(c)(5). Presumably no further action will be required in order to correct this technicality.

Accordingly, since you have confirmed that the transaction is exempt from the requirements of the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act, and the parties having consummated the transaction, we assume that your file in connection with this matter will not be closed.

Thank you for your cooperation.

Sincerely yours,

(Redacted)

(Redacted)

(redacted)

About Informal Interpretations

Informal interpretations provide guidance from previous staff interpretations on the applicability of the HSR rules to specific fact situations. You should not rely on them as a substitute for reading the Act and the Rules themselves. These materials do not, and are not intended to, constitute legal advice.

Learn more about Informal Interpretations.