1205016 Informal Interpretation

Michael Verne

- I agree with your analysis The buyer needs to take into account the intangibles when doing a FMV. The acquisition is of an ongoing business, so these intangibles add value to the business. K Walsh concurs.





Tuesday, May 22, 2012 9:43 AM


Verne, B. Michael; Walsh, Kathryn


FW: HSR Exemption

Mike and I(ate,

I am working on a transaction where the value of target non-exempt assets may be below $68.2 million, but that in part depends on how I apply the advice you recently gave below. See highlighted text, copied here: Y does not value the non-exempt assets as part of an ongoing business enterprise.

Assume that Buyer is acquiring 100% of target voting shares for $200 million. In applying 802.4 and looking down at the assets, there are certain exempt assets I ignore - e.g., cash and equivalents. There are few fixed assets, say they total $20 million (assume book and fair market are the same here). Assume this is an e commerce company as in the below example with current low revenue but lots of "potential" It is the intangibles that are giving me trouble in the context of your advice. These include the value of customer relationships, brand loyalty, trademarks and supplier relationships. On the books assume these are valued at $20 million, so that's $40 million, less than $68.2 million. But the test is fair market not book, and on that basis I assume they have a value close to $160 mm on the simplistic assumption that this is what Buyer is paying $200 million for. However, if Buyer takes your advice literally, they might conclude that these intangibles have little value because their value is in the context of this ongoing business. Broken up and sold separately outside of the context of this ongoing business, the intangibles likely have very little value, and hence no filing for a $200 million acquisition.

About Informal Interpretations

Informal interpretations provide guidance from previous staff interpretations on the applicability of the HSR rules to specific fact situations. You should not rely on them as a substitute for reading the Act and the Rules themselves. These materials do not, and are not intended to, constitute legal advice.

Learn more about Informal Interpretations.