The Federal Trade Commission today issued a report by staff of the Bureau of Economics entitled, “The Petroleum Industry: Mergers, Structural Change, and Antitrust Enforcement.” The report presents a detailed overview of structural changes in the petroleum industry and describes Commission law enforcement activities related to petroleum industry mergers.
The report develops five major themes: 1) Mergers of private oil companies have not significantly affected worldwide concentration in crude oil – this fact is important, because crude oil prices are the chief determinant of gasoline prices; 2) Despite some increases over time, concentration for most levels of the petroleum industry has remained low to moderate; 3) Thorough FTC merger investigations and enforcement have helped prevent further increases in petroleum industry concentration and avoid potentially anticompetitive problems and higher prices for consumers; 4) Economies of scale have become increasingly significant in shaping the petroleum industry; and 5) Industry developments have lessened the incentive to be vertically integrated throughout all or most levels of production, distribution, and marketing. Several significant refiners have no crude oil production, and integrated petroleum companies today tend to depend less on their own crude oil production.
“Like its predecessors, this report has two basic policy goals – to inform public policy concerning competition in the petroleum industry and to add transparency to the Commission’s merger analyses,” FTC Chairman Timothy J. Muris said. The report addresses a core component of the Commission’s petroleum industry program – the review of mergers. In this role, Muris said, the FTC has devoted substantial resources to investigating mergers and, in a number of instances, to blocking or modifying specific transactions within the petroleum industry.
“As even a casual reading will confirm, this report is the fruit of a major scholarly enterprise – an inquiry into the structural changes that have occurred in the petroleum industry over the last twenty years,” Muris said.
Organization of the Report
The report is organized into nine chapters, beginning with an executive summary that is followed by a description of the FTC’s merger enforcement actions in petroleum markets over the past 20 years. Next, it provides an overview of industry trends in petroleum pricing, capital expenditures, and rates of return, along with analysis of merger activity between 1985 and 2001, concluding with a discussion of the efficiencies that merging firms have claimed in various larger transactions. Finally, several chapters provide a detailed look at structural trends at specific industry levels.
Overview of the Petroleum Industry
The report provides a detailed overview and analysis of structural change in the petroleum industry, beginning with crude oil exploration and production and continuing with bulk transport of crude oil, refining, bulk transport of refined petroleum products, and product terminals and gasoline marketing. It then presents information on trends in flows of crude oil and refined products, vertical integration of the petroleum industry, and competitive consequences of government regulation.
Observations in this section include:
- The share of world crude oil production accounted for by U.S.-based companies declined from 11.4 percent in 1990 to 8.4 percent in 2002.
- Recent larger mergers among major oil companies have had little impact on concentration in world crude oil production and reserves.
- Private oil companies have small shares of world crude oil production and reserves, limiting any influence on world oil prices.
- Declining U.S. crude oil production has created excess capacity and caused many crude oil pipelines to close. Still, the pipeline infrastructure has undergone notable additions. In addition, concentration in the ownership of crude oil pipelines at the national level is generally low.
- The elimination of government controls on the pricing and allocation of crude oil between 1973 and 1981 that favored small refineries and provided incentives for companies to own and operate these less-efficient entities resulted in the closure of many smaller, less-efficient refineries.
- Technological changes within the industry have enabled refiners to get higher yields of lighter, more valuable products from crude oil than ever before.
- Since the mid-1980s, the average size and sophistication of U.S. refineries have increased. These larger refineries tend to be more efficient than smaller operations, and can produce gasoline and other products at a lower cost. In addition, while no new U.S. refineries still operating have been built since 1976, many have increased their operating capacity over the past two decades.
- Many refined product pipelines have recently expanded capacity, particularly those carrying products from the Gulf Coast to the Midwest and Mid-Continent.
- Gulf Coast refineries continue to produce most of the U.S.’s refined product and ship substantial volumes to the Midwest and East Coast; shipments from the Gulf Coast to the Rocky Mountains have begun to increase, and this trend is likely to continue.
- The development of “hypermarkets” has placed increased competitive pressure on existing gasoline markets, and hypermarkets have become important sources of retail gasoline in some areas. Hypermarkets sell significant volumes of gasoline at lower prices than their competitors, and, together with independent marketers, have increased competition in gasoline marketing in some areas.
- Large petroleum companies are not only acquiring assets but are divesting other assets at roughly the same rate. In the last half of the 1990s, at the same time that several mergers occurred among the largest oil companies, divestitures of oil-related assets exceeded acquisitions by over $30 billion. Although in the early 2000s acquisitions exceeded divestitures by about $52 billion, the net result was that large oil companies did not grow much larger in the past decade through acquisitions.
- Vertical integration between crude oil production and refining has tended to decline for the major oil companies in the past two decades. The incentives for vertical integration have diminished as refineries have become more flexible, and crude oil can now be acquired at less risk than before through market transactions.
- Environmental regulation has been among the most important modern influences on the U.S. petroleum industry, with many important requirements added during the 1980s and 1990s. These requirements affect market outcomes in important ways, including making certain areas more prone to price spikes than others in the event of a logistical problem such as a pipeline break. Regulations also may influence the number of competitors in a market, and, for a particular competitor, the array of products it is willing to supply.
FTC Law Enforcement Activities
“For more than 20 years, the FTC has been the federal antitrust agency primarily responsible for reviewing conduct in the petroleum industry to assess whether it is likely to reduce competition and harm consumer welfare,” the report states in summarizing relevant Commission law enforcement activities in both the merger and non-merger areas.
Since 1981, in 15 large petroleum mergers that the FTC has investigated, the Commission has alleged that these mergers would have resulted in significant reductions in competition and would have harmed consumers in one or more markets had they proceeded as announced. In 11
of these cases, the FTC obtained significant divestitures to prevent reduced competition and harm to consumers. In the four other cases, the parties abandoned the transactions altogether after antitrust challenge.
The report also details the FTC’s enforcement actions to protect competition and consumers of refined petroleum products, including administrative litigation against Union Oil Company of California (Unocal), the ongoing gasoline price monitoring program, and the investigation of gasoline pricing in the U.S.’s western states and Midwest region.
The Commission vote to issue the staff report, which is available on the FTC’s Web site, was 4-0-1, with Commissioner Pamela Jones Harbour abstaining. The Commission majority issued a separate statement, as did Commissioners Mozelle W. Thompson and Pamela Jones Harbour, and each statement is available as a link to this press release on the FTC’s Web site.
Copies of the staff report are available from the FTC’s Web site at http://www.ftc.gov and also from the FTC’s Consumer Response Center, Room 130, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20580. The FTC’s Bureau of Competition seeks to prevent business practices that restrain competition. The Bureau carries out its mission by investigating alleged law violations and, when appropriate, recommending that the Commission take formal enforcement action. To notify the Bureau concerning particular business practices, call or write the Office of Policy and Evaluation, Room 394, Bureau of Competition, Federal Trade Commission, 600 Pennsylvania Ave, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20580, Electronic Mail: firstname.lastname@example.org; Telephone (202) 326-3300. For more information on the laws that the Bureau enforces, the Commission has published “Promoting Competition, Protecting Consumers: A Plain English Guide to Antitrust Laws,” which can be accessed at http://www.ftc.gov/bc/compguide/index.htm.
(FTC File No. P859912)
- Media Contact:
- Mitchell J. Katz
Office of Public Affairs
- Staff Contact:
- William Kovacic
Office of the General Counsel