The legal library gives you easy access to the FTC’s case information and other official legal, policy, and guidance documents.
20192074: Blackstone Capital Partners VII NQ L.P.; Eugene Ludwig
Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection; Comment Request (Consumer Product Warranty Rule)
1910003 Informal Interpretation
Rule Concerning the Use of Prenotification Negative Option Plans
Alliance Document Preparation (EZ Doc Preps)
The operators of a student loan debt relief scam have agreed to settle Federal Trade Commission charges that they bilked millions from consumers by falsely claiming to enroll consumers in loan forgiveness programs, for which they charged up to $1,000 in illegal upfront fees. The FTC alleged in its complaint that the defendants deceptively telemarketed their document preparation service by misrepresenting an affiliation with the Department of Education or consumers’ loan servicers, and that consumers who paid defendants an up-front fee were qualified for or approved to receive permanently reduced monthly payments or their student loans would be forgiven or discharged. On September 30, 2019, the FTC sent more than $5.4 million to nearly 40,000 people who lost money to the alleged scheme.
20192035: Michael Paulus; Prudential Financial, Inc.
20192036: Michael Rowell; Prudential Financial, Inc.
20192037: Prudential Financial, Inc.; Michael Paulus
20192038: Prudential Financial, Inc.; Michael Rowell
Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection; Comment Request (Affiliate Marketing Rule)
Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection; Comment Request (Regulation N)
Written Testimony of Commissioner Chopra Before the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Financial Services: “Examining Legislation to Protect Consumers and Small Business Owners from Abusive Debt Collection Practices”
Match Group, Inc.
The Federal Trade Commission has sued online dating service Match Group, Inc. (Match), the owner of Match.com, Tinder, OKCupid, PlentyOfFish, and other dating sites, alleging that the company used fake love interest advertisements to trick hundreds of thousands of consumers into purchasing paid subscriptions on Match.com. The agency also alleges that Match has unfairly exposed consumers to the risk of fraud and engaged in other allegedly deceptive and unfair practices. For instance, the FTC alleges Match offered false promises of “guarantees,” failed to provide services to consumers who unsuccessfully disputed charges, and made it difficult for users to cancel their subscriptions.