Un sitio oficial del Gobierno de los Estados Unidos
Así es como usted puede verificarlo
El .gov significa que es oficial.
Los sitios web del gobierno federal siempre usan un dominio .gov o .mil. Antes de compartir información confidencial en línea, asegúrese de estar en un sitio .gov o .mil.
Este sitio es seguro.
El https:// medios todos los datos transmitidos son cifrados - en otras palabras, cualquier información o el historial de navegación que proporcione se transmite de forma segura.
Legal Library: Search
The legal library gives you easy access to the FTC’s case information and other official legal, policy, and guidance documents.
I agree with your analysis The buyer needs to take into account the intangibles when doing a FMV. The acquisition is of an ongoing business, so these intangibles add value to the business. K Walsh...
I agree with your analysis The buyer needs to take into account the intangibles when doing a FMV. The acquisition is of an ongoing business, so these intangibles add value to the business. K Walsh...
1. We have drawn a bright line on drafts submitted to the entire board of the person filing notification or the entire board of a sub (probably the acquisition vehicle), not a single director. Also...
1. We have drawn a bright line on drafts submitted to the entire board of the person filing notification or the entire board of a sub (probably the acquisition vehicle), not a single director. Also...
U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Joint brief of the United States, in which the FTC joined, as amicus curiae before the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, in support of the appellee, Ritz Camera & Image, LLC...
If a document is responsive to both just list it once in 4(c). You can footnote the fact that it is also responsive to 4(d) if you wish. Only provide one copy of the document.
We think this falls squarely under Item 4(d)(ii), assuming it is not over a year old. If it is older than one year, even though it is arguably not responsive to 4(c) because there was no deal on the...
We think this falls squarely under Item 4(d)(ii), assuming it is not over a year old. If it is older than one year, even though it is arguably not responsive to 4(c) because there was no deal on the...
If a document is responsive to both just list it once in 4(c). You can footnote the fact that it is also responsive to 4(d) if you wish. Only provide one copy of the document.