The legal library gives you easy access to the FTC’s case information and other official legal, policy, and guidance documents.
Displaying 6221 - 6240 of 6914
8702001 Informal Interpretation
Date
Rule
U.S.C. 201 (c)(2)
I advised (redacted) that the two transactions described are exempt- but are exempt under c(1) rather than c(2). I explained that exemption under c(2) might lead to the conclusion that all accounts...
File
Original Image File
(339.87 KB)
8702002 Informal Interpretation
Date
Rule
802.20(b)
Left message with message center that I agree with above.
File
Original Image File
(201.29 KB)
8702003 Informal Interpretation
Date
Rule
802.63(a)
I advised him that 802.63 was not broad enough to include the transaction
File
Original Image File
(481.92 KB)
8702005 Informal Interpretation
… 8702005 Informal Interpretation 8702005 Informal Interpretation … Improvements. Act of 1976, 16 C.F.R. 802.20(a), this transaction is exempt from the reporting and the waiting period … purposes of this letter, it may be assumed that the transaction is otherwise subject to the requirements of the Act …
Date
Rule
802.20(a)
Exempt re not meet the size of transaction test.
File
Original Image File
(247.22 KB)
8701008 Informal Interpretation
… 8701008 Informal Interpretation 8701008 Informal Interpretation … of the waiting period in connection with this transaction (filing No. 87-0677), Charitable Foundation A decided not to consummate the transaction. My client, the acquired person in No. 87-0677, then …
Date
Rule
801.10
:Parties advised (by Wayne Kaplan) 1/30/87 that letter contained insufficient info. for us to make a determination.
File
Original Image File
(282.02 KB)
8701004 Informal Interpretation
… 8701004 Informal Interpretation 8701004 Informal Interpretation … 15, 1986, the oldest partnership participating in this transaction had acquired property valued at (redacted) and the … as the purchasing partnerships were not formed or the transactions entered into as a device or devices for the purpose …
Date
Rule
801.1 (b)
Called on 1/16/87 confirmed his understanding set forth in paragraphs 3 and 4 on pp. 2 and 3
File
Original Image File
(187.45 KB)
8701003 Informal Interpretation
… 8701003 Informal Interpretation 8701003 Informal Interpretation Mr. … not appear proper to unnecessarily interfere with a transaction based upon aspects of the transaction based upon aspects of the transaction unrelated to …
Date
Rule
802.51
1/14/87 Called (redacted) not available left message with (redacted) that the 30 day waiting period not the 15 day period would apply to this transaction since the consummation includes other than...
File
Original Image File
(104.12 KB)
8701002 Informal Interpretation
… 8701002 Informal Interpretation 8701002 Informal Interpretation … I raised the following question. On (redacted) filed a Hart-Scott-Rodino Pre-merger Notification Form with … would be prevented from consummating the acquisition transaction during a second thirty-day waiting period that would …
Date
Rule
ABA #296
O.K.
File
Original Image File
(165.58 KB)
8701005 Informal Interpretation
… 8701005 Informal Interpretation 8701005 Informal Interpretation … Avenue, NW, Room 303 Washington, D.C. 20580 Re: FTC File No. 870679 Dear Mr. Scanlon: This letter confirms and … of it, which would be formed for purposes of this transaction. In fact, the acquisition will be made by a …
Date
Rule
ABA #296
Qualified upon later review. As long as the transaction is also the same and no different antitrust overlaps is stated then no new filing is required.
File
Original Image File
(166.05 KB)
8701006 Informal Interpretation
… 8701006 Informal Interpretation 8701006 Informal Interpretation … the opinion you expressed that the above described transaction does not meet the jurisdictional requirements of the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act (The Act). Specifically, the transaction does not fulfill the size of the parties test as set …
Date
Rule
801.11(c)(2)
OK upon later review
File
Original Image File
(291.08 KB)
8612011 Informal Interpretation
… 8612011 Informal Interpretation 8612011 Informal Interpretation (redacted) December 15, 1986 John M. … co-venturer. I told you that I would characterize this transaction as a transfer of a partnership interest which I …
Date
Rule
802.1 (b)
12/22/86 OK
File
Original Image File
(250.57 KB)
8612004 Informal Interpretation
… 8612004 Informal Interpretation 8612004 Informal Interpretation (redacted) December 3, 1986 Ms. … notification would no be required. The proposed transaction, to be embodied in a single purchase agreement, …
Date
Rule
801.1(c)
12/19/86- informed him over the phone that we agreed with his conclusion based on the facts stated.
File
Original Image File
(244.54 KB)
8612012 Informal Interpretation
… 8612012 Informal Interpretation 8612012 Informal Interpretation … telephone conversation this morning relating to the transaction (Sale Transaction) described in the above filing made on November 26, …
Date
Rule
Unknown
12/19/86 OK
File
Original Image File
(234.39 KB)
8612005 Informal Interpretation
… 8612005 Informal Interpretation 8612005 Informal Interpretation (redacted) December 8, 1986 Mr. … Very truly yours, (redacted) cc: (redacted) … 8612005 Informal Interpretation …
Date
Rule
801.11
OK 12/17/86
File
Original Image File
(121.08 KB)
8612009 Informal Interpretation
… 8612009 Informal Interpretation 8612009 Informal Interpretation … I have advised the client that notwithstanding satisfaction of the Size of Person and Size of Transaction tests, the transaction is not reportable under the …
Date
Rule
U.S.C. 18a
12/17/86 Indicated to (redacted) by phone that his conclusion of the facts as stated are correct.
File
Original Image File
(149.58 KB)
8612008 Informal Interpretation
… 8612008 Informal Interpretation 8612008 Informal Interpretation … voting preferred stock is being proposed in the transaction because Y Co. does have enough authorized but … Common stock that X Co. held prior to the series of transactions. The merger documents will mandate the conversion of …
Date
Rule
802.30
Trusts already own shares through X; no filing for acquisition of Y shares by trusts. However, Y acquisition of X in a merger is reportable and so notified. 12/12/86
File
Original Image File
(364.96 KB)
8612006 Informal Interpretation
… 8612006 Informal Interpretation 8612006 Informal Interpretation (redacted) Wayne Kaplan Premerger … or about November 15, 1986 (redacted) as acquiring person filed with your office a notification, filed by (redacted) …
Date
Rule
801.1
OK 12/11/86
File
Original Image File
(232.5 KB)
8612003 Informal Interpretation
… 8612003 Informal Interpretation 8612003 Informal Interpretation … my understanding that the above referenced form need not be filed where there is a transfer of less than one hundred … of this letter are (i) to outline the structure of a transaction whereby effective control in five (5) hotels, each of …
Date
Rule
801.2
O.K. 12/10/86
File
Original Image File
(184.33 KB)
8612002 Informal Interpretation
… 8612002 Informal Interpretation 8612002 Informal Interpretation … by real estate mortgages or deeds of trust. In the transaction contemplated, the assets being acquired represent … of our conversation, please return to me an FTC file-stamped copy of the duplicate of this letter in the …
Date
Rule
7A(c)(2)
12/4/86 Spoke with W.K. He had no problems under (c)(1) and states its probably ok under (c)(2) since the consumer loans are exclusively generated by no banks
File
Original Image File
(95.53 KB)
Displaying 6221 - 6240 of 6914