The legal library gives you easy access to the FTC’s case information and other official legal, policy, and guidance documents.
LightYear Dealer Technologies, LLC, In the Matter of
LightYear Dealer Technologies, LLC settled Federal Trade Commission allegations that the auto dealer software provider failed to take reasonable steps to secure consumers' data, leading to a breach that exposed the personal information of millions of consumers.
1909001 Informal Interpretation
1909003 Informal Interpretation
Global Processing Solutions, Advanced Mediation Group, Lamar Snow, Jahaan McDuffie, and Glentis Wallace
In November 2017, the Federal Trade Commission charged a Georgia-based debt collection business with tricking people into paying money for debts they did not owe. A federal court temporarily halted the scheme and froze its assets at the FTC’s request. In September 2018, the operators settled the FTC’s claims and are now banned from the debt collection business and from buying or selling debt. The FTC mailed refund checks in September 2019 totaling more than $516,000 to 3,977 consumers as part of the settlement.
1909005 Informal Interpretation
Granting of Requests for Early Termination of the Waiting Period Under the Premerger Notification Rules (May 2019)
Granting of Requests for Early Termination of the Waiting Period Under the Premerger Notification Rules (June 2019)
Granting of Requests for Early Termination of the Waiting Period Under the Premerger Notification Rules (July 2019)
20191869: Russel Metals Inc.; City Pipe & Supply Corp. Employee Stock Ownership Trust
Puerto Rico Telephone Company (Claro wireless service)
LabMD, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission
The Federal Trade Commission filed a complaint against medical testing laboratory LabMD, Inc. alleging that the company failed to reasonably protect the security of consumers’ personal data, including medical information.
Standard Industries LLC
In July 2017, the FTC obtained court orders against this Maryland-based office supply operation charged with tricking small businesses, non-profit organizations, and other consumers into paying for overpriced office and cleaning supplies they never ordered. The stipulated orders setting the FTC’s complaint barred the company and its principals from telemarketing office and cleaning supplies. It also imposed a financial judgment against them, resulting in the Commission sending refund checks totaling more than $11.6 million to small businesses and other organizations in August 2019.
1908002 Informal Interpretation
Letter from Joshua S. Millard, Staff Attorney, Division of Enforcement, Bureau of Consumer Protection
20191843: The Cheesecake Factory Incorporated; Samuel W. Fox
20191846: salesforce.com, inc.; Optimizer CaymanCo Limited
20191861: Cornell Capital Partners LP; Southfield Vanguard Investment LP
20191835: Genstar Capital Partners IX, L.P.; Primus Capital Fund VII, LP
UnitedHealth Group/DaVita, In the Matter of
The Federal Trade Commission has imposed conditions on UnitedHealth Group’s proposed acquisition of DaVita Medical Group. In its complaint, the FTC alleged that the proposed $4.3 billion acquisition would harm competition in healthcare markets in two Nevada counties, Clark and Nye. Under the proposed settlement, the FTC required UnitedHealth Group to divest DaVita’s HealthCare Partners of Nevada to Intermountain Healthcare. The Commission announced on Aug. 22, 2019 that the settlement was made final.