The legal library gives you easy access to the FTC’s case information and other official legal, policy, and guidance documents.
20150664: Rite Aid Corporation; TPG VI DE AIV II, L.P.
20150671: WPP plc; comScore, Inc.
20150675: WPP plc; comScore, Inc.
20150685: Heinz Hermann Thiele; Vossloh AG
Robocall Contest: “DetectaRobo”; Notice; Public Challenge to Analyze Data from a Robocall Honeypot
20150597: Accenture plc; Robert E LaRose Revocable Trust
20150614: Hitachi Ltd.; Pentaho Corporation
20150628: Healthstream, Inc.; Dan Littrell
20150637: Elliott International Limited; Informatica Corporation
20150638: 3M Company; Ivera Medical Corporation
20150639: Elliott Associates, L.P.; Informatica Corporation
20150648: Fir Tree Value Master Fund, L.P.; CDK Global, Inc.
20150651: Harbour Group Investments VI, L.P.; Audax Private Equity Fund III, L.P.
20150655: Berwind Corporation; Windjammer Senior Equity Fund III, L.P.
AmeriFreight, Inc. and Marius Lehmann; Analysis of Proposed Consent Order to Aid Public Comment
Eli Lilly and Company and Novartis AG, In the Matter of
Eli Lilly and Company agreed to divest its Sentinel product line of medications for treating heartworm disease in dogs in order to settle FTC charges that its proposed $5.4 billion acquisition of Novartis Animal Health would likely be anticompetitive. Under the settlement, Eli Lilly will divest its Sentinel product line and associated assets to the French pharmaceutical company, Virbac S.A. The FTC’s complaint challenging the transaction alleges that the proposed acquisition would be anticompetitive and lead to higher prices. According to the complaint, Eli Lilly’s Trifexis and Novartis Animal Health’s Sentinel products are particularly close substitutes because they are the only two products that are given orally once a month, contain the same active ingredient, and also treat fleas and other internal parasites in dogs.
Community Health Systems and Health Management Associates, In the Matter of
Under a proposed settlement, CHS will sell the Riverview Regional Medical Center and all of its associated operations and businesses near Gadsden, Alabama, and the Carolina Pines Regional Medical Center and of its associated operations and businesses near Hartsville, South Carolina, to Commission-approved buyers within six months after the order is issued. The divestitures resolve Commission charges that the combination would likely substantially lessen competition for general acute care (GAC) inpatient services sold to commercial health plans and provided to commercially insured patients in two local markets: 1) Etowah County, including the city of Gadsden, Alabama; and 2) Darlington County, South Carolina. Absent relief, CHS’s acquisition of HMA would eliminate valuable price and quality competition that has benefitted local patients in these two markets.