Legal Library: Search

1/17/95-Called writer and advised that it was the view of the PMN Office that the fact situation presented here did not create circumstances which are inconsistent with Ss claiming a solely for...

None noted

Facts of this letter indicate B is passive investor who wished to acquire extremely small % of voting stock. This status is not lost due to being a co-partner with parent of issuer.

None noted. [note 1-Chart/Outline -Exhibit A]

12/22/94-After discussing with John Sipple, I left voice mail for writer advising that the PMNOffice did not view the beneficial interests in the trusts as voting securities. Also, they did not appear...

12/22/94-After discussion with John Sipple, called writer and advised that in the PMN Offices view, a filing must be made before B Purchases the 25.5% of Cs voting stock since the option and...