The legal library gives you easy access to the FTC’s case information and other official legal, policy, and guidance documents.
16 CFR Part 305: Energy Labeling Rule; Final Rule; Correction
In the Supreme Court of the United States: Visa Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Sam Osborn, et al., and Visa Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Mary Stoumbos, et al., On Writ of Certiorari To the United States Court of Appeals For the District of Columbia Circuit
20170012: Bertram Growth Capital II, L.P.; Trademark Games Holdings, LLC
20170057: Kendall Automotive Group, Inc.; Cal Worthington Trust
Caledonia Investments plc
Investment trust Caledonia Investments plc agreed to pay $480,000 in civil penalties to resolve charges that it violated federal premerger reporting laws by failing to report its purchase in 2014 of voting shares in the helicopter services company Bristow Group, Inc. According to the complaint, in June 2008, Caledonia first acquired voting shares in Bristow and reported its purchase to U.S. antitrust authorities, as required under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act. Subsequently, Caledonia made additional purchases that were exempt from reporting under HSR rules. During that same timeframe, however, two Caledonia employees were designated to serve on Bristow’s board. Bristow awards restricted-stock voting securities to its board members, and by agreement, it set aside the securities for the two Caledonia board members for purchase by Caledonia. In February 2014, these voting shares vested, and Caledonia acquired them, according to the complaint. The Commission charged that Caledonia was required under the HSR Act to report this purchase but failed to do so. The HSR Act allows a company that has reported an initial purchase of voting shares to purchase additional voting shares from the same issuer – as long as those purchases do not cause the company’s total holdings to cross a higher reporting threshold over a five-year period following the initial purchase. The complaint charges that Caledonia’s 2014 purchase of voting shares in Bristow fell outside the five-year period following its initial purchase.
1610008 Informal Interpretation
20170076: WellCare Health Plans, Inc.; California Physicians' Service
Zeltiq Aesthetic, Inc. (CoolSculpting® Cryolipolysis® Body Contouring System)
20161815: Anadarko Petroleum Corporation; Freeport-McMoRan Inc.
1610007 Informal Interpretation
The Penn State Hershey Medical Center/PinnacleHealth System, In the Matter of
The Commission issued an administrative complaint alleging that the combination of Penn State Hershey Medical Center and PinnacleHealth System would substantially reduce competition for general acute care inpatient hospital services in the area surrounding Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, and lead to reduced quality and higher health care costs for the area’s employers and residents. The Commission also authorized staff to file a preliminary injunction to maintain the status quo pending the outcome of its administrative proceeding.
20170056: Eldorado Resorts, Inc.; Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc.
1610006 Informal Interpretation
Antitrust Guidance For Human Resource Professionals: Department of Justice Antitrust Division and Federal Trade Commission (October 2016)
1610005 Informal Interpretation
Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Warner Chilcott PLC
20170009: Allergan plc; Tobira Therapeutics, Inc.
20170033: Rice Midstream Partners LP; Rice Energy Inc.
Penn State Hershey Medical Center, FTC and Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v.
The FTC issued an administrative complaint and authorized staff to file a preliminary injunction to block Penn State Hershey Medical Center's proposed merger with PinnacleHealth System. The complaint alleged that combining the two health care providers would substantially reduce competition for general acute care inpatient hospital services sold to commercial health plans iin four south-central Pennsylvania counties, leading to reduced quality and higher prices for employers and residents.