The legal library gives you easy access to the FTC’s case information and other official legal, policy, and guidance documents.
20141207: Twenty-First Century Fox, Inc.; Cox Family Voting Trust u/a/d 7/26/13
16 CFR Part 20: Guides for the Rebuilt, Reconditioned and Other Used Auto Parts Industry; Final Revisions to the Guides
16 CFR Part 304: Rules and Regulations Under the Hobby Protection Act; Request for Comments on the Overall Costs and Benefits, and the Regulatory and Economic Impact of the Hobby Protection Act Rules
Rebuilt, Reconditioned and Other Used Automobile Parts
20141103: AmSurg Corp.; Hellman & Friedman Capital Partners VI, L.P.
20141104: Hellman & Friedman Capital Partners VI, L.P.; AmSurg Corp.
20141106: Hellman and Friedman Capital Partners VI (Parallel), L.P.; AmSurg Corp.
20141153: WEX Inc.; Genstar Capital Partners V, L.P.
20141178: John C. Malone; Liberty Interactive Corporation
20141186: Oleum S.a.r.l.; Deoleo S.A.
20140842: GTCR Fund IX/A, L.P.; Nordion (Canada) Inc.
20141171: Google, Inc.; Dropcam, Inc.
20141184: Motherson Sumi Systems Limited; Stoneridge, Inc.
20141192: Calera Capital Partners IV, L.P.; USS Parent Holding Corp.
20141195: TA XI L.P.; SkinnyPop Popcorn LLC
Actavis plc and Forest Laboratories: Federal Register Notice Containing Analysis to Aid Public Comment on the Proposed Consent Agreement
L’Oréal USA, Inc.; Federal Register Notice Containing Analysis to Aid Public Comment on the Proposed Consent Agreement
20141119: BVO Holdings, LLC; Ronald I. Dozoretz, M.D. and Beth Dozoretz
Tecnica Group, In the Matter of
The FTC alleged that starting in 2004 Marker Völkl and Tecnica agreed not to compete with each other to secure endorsements by professional skiers, in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act. Specifically, the FTC charges that Marker Völkl agreed not to solicit, recruit, or contact any skier who previously endorsed Tecnica skis, and Tecnica agreed to a similar arrangement with respect to Marker Völkl’s endorsers. In addition, the complaint states that in 2007, the companies expanded the scope of their non-compete agreement to cover all of their employees. The orders settling the FTC’s charges bar each firm from engaging in similar anticompetitive conduct in the future.