Un sitio oficial del Gobierno de los Estados Unidos
Así es como usted puede verificarlo
El .gov significa que es oficial.
Los sitios web del gobierno federal siempre usan un dominio .gov o .mil. Antes de compartir información confidencial en línea, asegúrese de estar en un sitio .gov o .mil.
Este sitio es seguro.
El https:// medios todos los datos transmitidos son cifrados - en otras palabras, cualquier información o el historial de navegación que proporcione se transmite de forma segura.
Legal Library: Search
The legal library gives you easy access to the FTC’s case information and other official legal, policy, and guidance documents.
… of "exclusive dental plans"; proposed dental society disciplinary action against dentists sponsoring such plans Advisory Opinion … Suffolk County Dental …
Date
re: Legality of "exclusive dental plans"; proposed dental society disciplinary action against dentists sponsoring such plans
… Medical Cooperative re: Physician network joint venture between physician directed managed care … organization and group of physician providers Advisory Opinion … South East Managed Care Organization/Jackson Medical …
Date
re: Physician network joint venture between physician directed managed care organization and group of physician providers
… ACMG, Inc ACMG, Inc re: Proposed agreement between state medical society and independent health care management and development company … to establish society sponsored state-wide PPO Advisory Opinion … ACMG, Inc …
Date
re: Proposed agreement between state medical society and independent health care management and development company to establish society sponsored state-wide PPO
… 9407008 Informal Interpretation 9407008 Informal Interpretation July 19, 1994 … conversation of last week regarding a determination of the ultimate parent entity of a limited partnership. As we …
… 9407009 Informal Interpretation 9407009 Informal Interpretation July 21, 1994 … Dear Ms. Ovuka: This letter is to confirm our discussion inthe above-referenced telephone conferences and certain …
Date
Rule
801.11
If asset acquisition were made by Company As UPE, the individual, the value of the assetswould be included and added to Company As regularly prepared balance sheet.
… FTC Staff Comment Before the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms Concerning Relationships Between Suppliers and Retailers Enviado … Before the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms Concerning Relationships Between Suppliers and Retailers …
… 9406007 Informal Interpretation 9406007 Informal Interpretation June 22, 1994 … 20580 Re: Request for Staff Interpretation of Section 7A of the Clayton Act Dear Ms. Ovuka: This letter requests an …
Date
Rule
7A(c)(1)
6/23-The transfer of a used (redacted) as a trade-in on a new (redacted) is exempt in the ordinary course of business. The parties are not competitors. Also, used (redacted) has been used as a...
… 9606005 Informal Interpretation 9606005 Informal Interpretation (redacted) … Pursuant to your invitation, we are writing to confirm the substance of that conversation and to seek, pursuant to … that this transaction is not reportable under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as …
6/19/94 Writers co-counsel advises that Bishop of diocese is one of 5 trustees of (redacted) Corp. A but does not directly appoint the other 4. Bishop also does not directly appoint three members who...
… Advisory opinion on whether proposed interlocking directorate would violate provisions of Final Order entered against SCM Advisory opinion on whether proposed interlocking directorate would violate …
Date
Due to insufficient information supplied by respondent SCM Corporation, Commission was unable to determine whether proposed interlocking directorate would violate provisions of Final Order entered...
… 9406005 Informal Interpretation 9406005 Informal Interpretation June 13, 1994 … Interest Dear Mr. Smith: I am writing to follow up on the various telephone conversations we have had regarding …
Date
Rule
801.40; 801.1(f)(1)
6/16/94-called writer and advised that the conclusions reached in this letter were correct.(The writer had previously informed me that there were no avoidance intent behind the manner in which this...
… 9406006 Informal Interpretation 9406006 Informal Interpretation June 14, 1994 … NW Room 303 Washington, D.C. 20580 Dear Mr. Hancock: Further with respect to our telephone conversation today, … conclusion correct that no Notification need be filed by either of the two corporations involved inthe merger?[note 1] …
Date
Rule
802.20(b)
6/16/94 - Called writer and told him this is OK. [note 1-Memorandum to File]
… 9406004 Informal Interpretation 9406004 Informal Interpretation VIA HAND DELIVERY Nancy Ovuka Premerger Notification Office … is to confirm our telephone conversation earlier today. The facts are as follows: Company B currently has a wholly …
Date
Rule
801.11(e)
6/15/94-Neither formation or subsequent acquisition is reportable. [note 1-If $16 MM from bank is not guaranteed by other investors (and bank not getting voting stock), then Company A appears to have...
… 9406003 Informal Interpretation 9406003 Informal Interpretation VIA FACSIMILE … This letter is to confirm our telephone conversation on the morning of June 6, 1994 as clarified on the morning of …
Date
Rule
801.15
6/9/94 - Called letter writer and advised that I was in agreement with the analysis and conclusions in this letter. [note 1-site sketch]
… 9406001 Informal Interpretation 9406001 Informal Interpretation June 7, 1994 … D.C. 20580 Dear Ms. Epps: This letter is to confirm the verbal opinion given by you, a member of the FTC Premerger Notification Staff, on May 31, 1994. The …
Date
Rule
801.2
6/8/94 I called (redacted) and confirmed that the above-stated opinion constitutes the policy of the Premerger Notification Office and is not binding on the Commission.
… 9406002 Informal Interpretation 9406002 Informal Interpretation VIA FACSIMILE … our discussion of June 3, 1994, in which we reviewed the determination of the “ultimate parent entity” of a corporation making an …
Date
Rule
801.1(b)(2); 801.1(c)(4); 801.11(b)(1) and (2)
6/8/94-Advised writer that I agreed with his conclusion that Mrs. A did not have the contractual power to designate (or to vote in) 50% or more of the directors of the Corporation or the trustees of...