The legal library gives you easy access to the FTC’s case information and other official legal, policy, and guidance documents.
Telemarketing Sales Rule Fees - 16 CFR Part 310
20030778: Nabi Biopharmaceuticals; Braintree Holdings
20030767: Select Medical Corporation; The Henry H. Kessler Foundation, Inc.
0307013 Informal Interpretation
20030811: Cadence Design Systems, Inc.; Verplex Systems, Inc.
20030794: Florida Rock Industries, Inc.; Lafarge S.A.
20030762: J.W. Childs Equity Partners II, L.P.; Keith E. Loiselle
Baxter International
Consent order requires divestiture of Baxter's Autoplex product line of Factor VIII inhibitors used in the treatment for hemophilia and the licensing of Immuno International AG's fibrin sealant, a biologic product in development to be used to control bleeding in surgical procedures. According to the complaint issued with the final order, the acquisition of Immuno International would tend to create a monopoly and increase Baxter's ability to unilaterally raise prices in the market for the research, manufacture and sale of biologic products derived from human blood plasma.
Snore Formula, Inc., et al., also d/b/a KJ Enterprises, In the Matter of
Prepared Statement of the Federal Trade Commission On Financial Literacy and Consumer Education
Prepared Statement of the Federal Trade Commission On Financial Literacy and Consumer Education
20030815: Sandler Capital Partners V, L.P.; Paul G. Allen
20030806: Cooperativa De Serguros Mutiples De Puerto Rico; Royal & Sun Alliance Insurance Group plc
20030647: Grupo TMM, S.A.; Kansas City Southern
On Review of UPL Advisory Opinion
Polygram Holding, Inc.; Decca Music Group Limited; UMG Recordings, Inc.; and Universal Music & Video Distribution Corp
The Commission issued an administrative complaint against Warner Communications, Inc., and several subsidiaries of Vivendi Universal S.A., charging them with illegally agreeing to fix prices for audio and video products featuring The Three Tenors. A settlement with Warner barred future agreements to fix prices or restrict advertising. After an administrative trial against Vivendi, an ALJ found that the agreement, while made in association with an otherwise legal joint venture between the companies, violated Section 5 of the FTC Act by illegally reducing competition in the U.S. market for the audio and video products cited. The Commission upheld the ruling of an administrative law judge and prohibited PolyGram from entering into any agreement with competitors to fix the prices or restrict the advertising of products they have produced independently. In July 2005, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit affirmed the Commission’s decision in Polygram Holding Inc., validating the Commission’s approach to analyzing horizontal conduct among competitors.