The legal library gives you easy access to the FTC’s case information and other official legal, policy, and guidance documents.
1903001 Informal Interpretation
1903003 Informal Interpretation
1903006 Informal Interpretation
20190933: Wellspring Capital Partners VI, L.P.; Wind Point Partners VIII-A, L.P.
Ronnie Montano
Ronnie Montano, Hyong Su Kim (also known as Jimmy Kim), Martin Schranz and their related companies, settled Federal Trade Commission allegations that they deceived consumers by falsely claiming they could earn big money working online by using products marketed as "secret codes."
20190904: Tempo Holding Company, LLC; Azim Premji
20190910: Providence Equity Partners VIII L.P.; David Bernstein
20190900: American Electric Power Company, Inc.; Sempra Energy
Solve America’s Problems, doing business as, TV Liquidator
Prepared Statement of the Federal Trade Commission Before the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations of the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, United States Senate
16 CFR Part 24: Guides for Select Leather and Imitation Leather Products
Advertising Strategies, LLC, et al.
The Federal Trade Commission is sending refund checks totaling more than $7 million to people deceived by the operators of an alleged business opportunity fraud that targeted seniors and others living on a fixed income. The refunds stem from a settlement the FTC reached in 2017 with Advertising Strategies, LLC, under which the defendants surrendered virtually all their assets to provide consumer refunds.
James L. Dolan
James L. Dolan, Executive Chairman of Madison Square Garden Company, has agreed to pay $609,810 in civil penalties to resolve Federal Trade Commission allegations that he violated the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act by failing to report in a timely manner his acquisition of voting securities in Madison Square Garden Company.
Premium Grants
A federal district court in Arizona entered three stipulated orders on February 26, 2019, settling the FTC’s case against the operators of a sham grant scheme known as Premium Grants. The defendants targeted individuals, many of whom are elderly or have disabilities, who sought help with paying personal expenses such as medical bills, home repairs, and debt.