The legal library gives you easy access to the FTC’s case information and other official legal, policy, and guidance documents.
20260374: Francisco Partners VII-A, L.P.; JAMF Holding Corp.
20260385: Five Arrows Principal Investments IV SCSp SICAV-RAIF; Accel-KKR Emerging Buyout Partners, LP
20260387: Ryerson Holding Corporation; Olympic Steel, Inc.
20260389: KBR, Inc.; ORIX Corporation
20260390: Endurance HoldingCo, LLC; ORIX Corporation
20260393: Livewire Holdings, LP; BP I LM Aggregator LP
20260396: Cameron Brokerage, LLC; The Anthony L. Johnson Revocable Trust u/a/d August 10, 2023
20260399: The Andover Companies, Inc.; Cambridge Mutual Insurance Holding Company
20260418: Haymaker Acquisition Corp. 4; Dothan Concrete Investors, LLC
20260427: Carlyle Partners VIII Lux, S.C.Sp.; BASF SE
Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection; Comment Request; Extension (Warranty Rule)
Illusory Systems/Nomad
The FTC is taking action against Illusory Systems Inc. for failing to implement adequate data security measures, leading to a major security breach in which hackers stole $186 million from consumers.
Uber, FTC v.
The Federal Trade Commission sued Uber Technologies, Inc. and Uber USA LLC (collectively, “Uber”) for alleged violations of Section 5 of the FTC Act and the Restore Online Shoppers’ Confidence
Act (“ROSCA”). Among other things, the complaint alleges that Uber charges consumers for its subscription service, Uber One, through a negative option feature but has failed to provide a simple mechanism to stop recurring charges. The complaint also alleges Uber has charged consumers without their consent in violation of the FTC Act and ROSCA. Further, the complaint alleges Uber falsely claims that consumers can cancel Uber One at “any time” with no additional fees.
The FTC filed a lawsuit today against Uber, alleging the rideshare and delivery company charged consumers for its Uber One subscription service without their consent, failed to deliver promised savings, and made it difficult for users to cancel the service despite its “cancel anytime” promises.
Henkel, A-Paint
The Federal Trade Commission sued to block Henkel AG & Co. KGaA (Henkel), the manufacturer of the industry-leading Loctite brand construction adhesives, from acquiring Loctite’s main competitor, Liquid Nails. The FTC alleges that the merger would eliminate fierce competition between Loctite and Liquid Nails, leading to higher prices, lower quality, and reduced innovation, all of which would be detrimental to American consumers.
CarShield
In July 2024, NRRM, LLC, which does business as CarShield, along with American Auto Shield, LLC, the administrator of its vehicle service contracts, agreed to pay $10 million to settle FTC charges that its advertisements and telemarketing for VSC are deceptive and misleading, and that many purchasers found that many repairs were not “covered,” despite making payments of up to $120 per month. The FTC also alleges CarShield’s celebrity and consumer endorsers made false statements in its ads. In December 2025, the FTC announced it was sending $9.6 million to defrauded consumers.
Legion Media LLC, et al., FTC v.
In July 2024, a U.S. district court in central Florida unsealed a Federal Trade Commission complaint charging two related groups of defendants with defrauding consumers nationwide by enrolling them, without their knowledge, into continuity plans where they are shipped and charged repeatedly for personal care products that they did not agree to purchase.
The defendants allegedly deceived consumers with ads for “free” CBD and Keto-related personal care products, billing many for products they did not consent to purchase, signing many up for unwanted continuity plans, and debiting money from their bank accounts without prior authorization. In September 2024, the FTC announced three orders settling the Commission’s complaint. In December 2025, the FTC announced it was returning 27.6 million to defrauded consumers.