Pasar al contenido principal

Refine your results

Filtros
Buscar
Include spaces in matter number if applicable. Ex.: 182 3125
Fecha
Displaying 43761 - 43780 of 44618
HSR Informal Interpretations

8503001 Informal Interpretation

… 8503001 Informal Interpretation 8503001 Informal Interpretation … Room 303 Federal Trade Commission Washington, D.C. 20580 USA (redacted) (redacted) 15.3.85 Re:Request for … CFR para. 803.30: Premerger Notification Requirements under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 16 …
Date
Rule
801.40; 802.50; 802.51
No written comments
HSR Informal Interpretations

8502010 Informal Interpretation

… 8502010 Informal Interpretation 8502010 Informal Interpretation (redacted) … Mr. Scanlon: I believe that yesterday you spoke with one of the other attorneys in this firm concerning the application …
Date
Rule
7A(c)(8)
2/27/85 T/C Scanlon/(redacted). I explained that HSR did not recognize thegroup concept of SEC and that the individuals should be considered separately(aggregating spouse and minor children) and...
HSR Informal Interpretations

8502007 Informal Interpretation

… 8502007 Informal Interpretation 8502007 Informal Interpretation (redacted) … Washington, D.C. 20580 Re:Interpretation of Control under the Pre-Merger Notification Regulations Dear Mr. Kaplan: On … January 30, 1985, I spoke with you by telephone concerning the applicability of the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust …
Date
Rule
801.1(b)
2/19/85 called (redacted) and he described partners. No overlap w/ acquiredperson in Addies transaction and 1st transaction is'nt ready. (redacted) will call if that one proceeds. Wayne Kaplan
HSR Informal Interpretations

8502004 Informal Interpretation

… 8502004 Informal Interpretation 8502004 Informal Interpretation (redacted) … your response to my telephone inquiry yesterday regarding the possible requirement of filing a premerger notification on the facts which I described to you. Those facts are as …
Date
Rule
802.50; 802.20
2/11/85 T/C Scanlon (redacted). Told (redacted) my advice to him as described inthis letter was inaccurate and that the facts described in this letter constitute areportable transaction since the...
HSR Informal Interpretations

8502003 Informal Interpretation

… 8502003 Informal Interpretation 8502003 Informal Interpretation … our telephone conversation of February 4, 1985 regarding whether a filing is required under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act of … Room 301 6th and Pennsylvania, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20580 HAND DELIVERY 113. Applicable subsection of the rules: …
Date
Rule
802.50; 801.15
Dana objects on basis 802.20 not w/in 801.15 & suggests parties file. I notified(redacted) secretary on 2/8/85 that the letter is inaccurate and that a filing is required by both parties. See attached...
HSR Informal Interpretations

8502006 Informal Interpretation

… 8502006 Informal Interpretation 8502006 Informal Interpretation (redacted) … having membership and milk marketing operations throughout the northeastern United States. (redacted) has entered into a …
Date
Rule
801.10; 802.20
Note: It has not been determined that the cooperative share is a voting security. amerger normally means an acquisition of all of the v/s. However, this may or may not be one of the exceptions. It is...
HSR Informal Interpretations

8502009 Informal Interpretation

… 8502009 Informal Interpretation 8502009 Informal Interpretation (redacted) … We wrote to you on February 12, 1985 with respect to the proposed merger of (redacted). This will confirm our … upon review of our February 12, 1985 correspondence that the proposed transaction is exempt under 16CFR 802.1, et …
Date
Rule
802.20
Wrong, exempt under 802.20
HSR Informal Interpretations

8502012 Informal Interpretation

… 8502012 Informal Interpretation 8502012 Informal Interpretation … associate, (redacted) spoke with you on February 13 about the applicability of the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust … for purposes of the Act control of such stock is in the hands of the company just as if the stock had been redeemed …
Date
Rule
802.30
Not exempt under 802.30 must file. Wayne, Kaplan, Andy, Suzzanne & Danaconcur. called (redacted) 2-26-85. This transaction is not exempt under 802.30and you must file if it meets the size requirements...
Amicus Briefs

Snider et al. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

… Snider et al. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. Snider et al. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. FTC amicus brief in Snider et al. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. concerning conflicts between the Oklahoma Unfair Sales Act and Federal Antitrust Laws …
Date
FTC amicus brief in Snider et al. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. concerning conflicts between the Oklahoma Unfair Sales Act and Federal Antitrust Laws
HSR Informal Interpretations

8501003 Informal Interpretation

… 8501003 Informal Interpretation 8501003 Informal Interpretation (redacted) … 802.50 Dear Mr. Scanlon: This will confirm your advice on the telephone today concerning the application of the premerger notification requirements …
Date
Rule
802.50
OK AMScanlon 1/28/85
HSR Informal Interpretations

8501001 Informal Interpretation

… 8501001 Informal Interpretation 8501001 Informal Interpretation (redacted) … Sharpe Gentlemen: Your advice is hereby requested as to whether the following described transaction(s), if effected, would …
Date
Rule
802.1; 802.2
Are they buying this retail space to operate or as an investment? They are buyingthese rental building in order to resell as condominiums. Who is making theacquisition? We are not sure yet. Perhaps a...
HSR Informal Interpretations

8501002 Informal Interpretation

… 8501002 Informal Interpretation 8501002 Informal Interpretation (redacted) 16 … Commission Washington, D.C. 20580 Re:Acquisition of all of the stock of (redacted) Dear Mr. Sharpe: This letter … our telephone conversation of 3 January 1985 concerning the application of the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust …
Date
Rule
801.10; 802.20
comments: Wayne Kaplan said contingent payments should be estimated according to 801.10 of the rules and included in transaction price. Andy Scanlon agrees and added that they indicate a face value...
HSR Informal Interpretations

8501004 Informal Interpretation

… 8501004 Informal Interpretation 8501004 Informal Interpretation (redacted) January 23, 1985 HAND-DELIVERED Mr. Patrick Sharpe Compliance Specialist … N.W. Room 303 Washington, D.C. 20580 Dear Mr. Sharpe: The purpose of this letter is to confirm our January 14, …
Date
Rule
7A(c)(1); 802.1; now See 802.2
The FTC staff has historically said that the acquisition of office buildings is generally exempt (no retail space or other income producing properties included) under § 802.1 of the rules. Is this...
HSR Informal Interpretations

8412001 Informal Interpretation

… 8412001 Informal Interpretation 8412001 Informal Interpretation (redacted) … conversation of earlier today in which we discussed the proposed disposition by our client of all of the stock of a U.S. subsidiary and the proposed disposition …
Date
Rule
802.20; 802.50
See diagram. We examine the 802.20 & 802.50 by issuer. Accordingly, thesetransactions are exempt given the information provided. [Note: No Facts, dollar values given, but enough info (less than $15 mm...
HSR Informal Interpretations

8412003 Informal Interpretation

… 8412003 Informal Interpretation 8412003 Informal Interpretation ( redacted) … to you dated December 4, 1984. We hereby confirm that the music publishing business of the (redacted) of companies will be acquired by a new …
Date
Rule
801.40; 802.20
12/6/84 (redacted) 2d letter. Pg1 1. Refers to acquisitions plural – if so newly formed entity rule will not protect 2d etc acquisitions Pg2 2. refers to several sellers – if they are outside. Pg3 3...
HSR Informal Interpretations

8412006 Informal Interpretation

… 8412006 Informal Interpretation 8412006 Informal Interpretation (redacted) … of November 21, 1984, in which you advised me that the completion of the two transactions hereinafter described would not require …
Date
Rule
801.11
But must consolidate unconsolidated cos [indecipherable]. A [indecipherable].
Displaying 43761 - 43780 of 44618
Return to top