The legal library gives you easy access to the FTC’s case information and other official legal, policy, and guidance documents.
20251483: Carronade Capital Master, LP; Telephone and Data Systems, Inc.
20251492: ORIX Corporation; Hilco Trading, LLC
20251502: Cortec Group Fund VIII, L.P.; AMCP III Legacy AIV, LP
20251513: White Mountains Insurance Group, Ltd.; AQ Phoenix Parent, L.P.
20251519: SoftBank Corp.; Cybereason Inc.
20251523: Gryphon Digital Mining, Inc.; Hut 8 Corp.
20251528: Valor Equity Partners VI-B L.P.; Elon Musk
Surgical Instrument Service Co. v. Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
20251447: Ferdinand Porsche Familien Privatstiftung; Group14 Technologies, Inc.
20251473: Durare Topco, L.P.; Capricorn Holdco, LLC
20251475: Churchill Sponsor IX LLC; Plus Automation, Inc.
20251489: Suzhou Dongshan Precision Manufacturing Co., Ltd.; Source Photonics Holdings (Cayman) Limited
20251498: Emprise Group, Inc.; TCW Rescue Financing Fund LP
20251499: Mubadala Investment Company PJSC; Tallwood Technology Partners LLC
20251501: Nordic Capital XI Gamma, SCSp; Arcadia Solutions, Inc.
Amazon.com, Inc. (ROSCA), FTC v.
The Federal Trade Commission is taking action against Amazon.com, Inc. for its years-long effort to enroll consumers into its Prime program without their consent while knowingly making it difficult for consumers to cancel their subscriptions to Prime.
In a complaint filed today, the FTC charges that Amazon has knowingly duped millions of consumers into unknowingly enrolling in Amazon Prime. Specifically, Amazon used manipulative, coercive, or deceptive user-interface designs known as “dark patterns” to trick consumers into enrolling in automatically-renewing Prime subscriptions.
Amazon also knowingly complicated the cancellation process for Prime subscribers who sought to end their membership. The primary purpose of its Prime cancellation process was not to enable subscribers to cancel, but to stop them. Amazon leadership slowed or rejected changes that would’ve made it easier for users to cancel Prime because those changes adversely affected Amazon’s bottom line.
FBA Machine/Passive Scaling, FTC v.
In June 2024, the FTC filed suit against FBA Machine and Bratislav Rozenfeld (also known as Steven Rozenfeld and Steven Rozen) alleging that, in a business opportunity scheme, they falsely guaranteed that consumers could make money operating online storefronts using AI-powered software. The defendants allegedly failed to deliver on the promised earnings claims and defrauded consumers out of over $15 million.
As a result of the FTC’s complaint, a federal court issued an order temporarily halting the scheme and putting it under the control of a receiver.
The FTC later added Amanda Peremen, Rozenfeld’s wife, as a relief defendant in the case. The amended complaint alleged that, though not directly involved in the scheme, she received proceeds from it.
In July 2025, the FTC announced that Rozenfeld will be permanently banned from selling business opportunities in settlement of FTC’s allegations and will be required to turn over the contents of multiple financial accounts and any funds realized upon the sale of real estate property. The proceeds will be used for consumer redress.