Legal Library: Search

12/6/84 (redacted) 2d letter. Pg1 1. Refers to acquisitions plural – if so newly formed entity rule will not protect 2d etc acquisitions Pg2 2. refers to several sellers – if they are outside. Pg3 3...

But must consolidate unconsolidated cos [indecipherable]. A [indecipherable].

Comments in body of letter only (See below)

See attached note re [indecipherable] of advice transmitted by telephone to(redacted) on 11/30. [Indecipherable] and by W.E.K. on 11/26/84. The fact thatB is making loans and guarantees to the newly...

11/6/84 Called [indecipherable] - He is not available. told his secy that we do notrespond by mail but that I agree with the statements in this letter & confirm his understanding AMS 11/6/84

I concur. called (redacted) and left message with his secretary.

No written comments

Comments in body of letter only(see below)

No written comments. [Note: Advice incorrect; partnerships can be controlled. See 801.1(b)(2).]

10/29/ (redacted) letter response 10/30/84. 1. Not significantly except to extent system fails [indecipherable] we have to spend time looking for necessary documents. 2. Yes - See p33524 - if entities...

No written comments

No written comments

No written comments

No written comments

No written comments

No written comments

T/C 9/25/84 Scanlon - [unknown person] I explained retention of $10 MM abovepass through money could make this deal reportable - He will send supplemental letter citing his understanding of this. ams(...

Initialed by WEK 9/13/84. O (redacted) letter. B Parent [holds] 80% [of] sub 20%[of which is] held by Client Smith. A to acquire B (Parent) of B sub. Prior to A acq Smith will form Smith Inc & will...