Pasar al contenido principal

Refine your results

Filtros
Buscar
Include spaces in matter number if applicable. Ex.: 182 3125
Fecha
Displaying 34401 - 34420 of 45718
HSR Informal Interpretations

0010014 Informal Interpretation

… 0010014 Informal Interpretation 0010014 Informal Interpretation … the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvement Act of 1976 and the Federal Trade Commission's implementing regulations … Hancock dated July 25, 1997 re: indemnity reinsurance transactions and the Letter to Victor Cohen dated November …
Date
Rule
7A(c)(1)
It remains the position of the PNO that indemnity reinsurance transactions are not acquisitions under the rules and hence are not reportable. TFH
HSR Informal Interpretations

0010016 Informal Interpretation

… 0010016 Informal Interpretation 0010016 Informal Interpretation … question regarding the content of a Premerger Notification and Report filing on a unusual set of facts. A is a natural … of earning based on year 2000 projections. These other transactions may or may not be independently reportable …
Date
Rule
Item 5
There is no requirement that B provide information on the entities it plans to acquire if A closes on the A accusation of B voting stock first.
HSR Informal Interpretations

0010017 Informal Interpretation

… 0010017 Informal Interpretation 0010017 Informal Interpretation … S ubject: HSR Question Mike: Please respond to the following question about an ambiguity under Formal Interpretation Number 15. Depending on your advice and any follow-up communications. I may later request in …
Date
Rule
Formal Interpretation 15
Y does not have the right to 50% of the assets on distribution.
HSR Informal Interpretations

0010001 Informal Interpretation

… 0010001 Informal Interpretation 0010001 Informal Interpretation From … will enter into a separate Supply Agreement with Company B and Company's B parent, giving Company A the right to sell … for tax reasons and was not motivated at all by HSR considerations. It would seem to me that assuming that the …
Date
Rule
801.90
Agree
HSR Informal Interpretations

0010002 Informal Interpretation

… 0010002 Informal Interpretation 0010002 Informal Interpretation … October 3, 2000 VIA FACSIMILE Michael Verne Premerger Notification Office Bureau of Competition Federal Trade … D.C. 20580 Dear Mike: I am writing to confirm my understanding of telephone conversations we had on September 28, …
Date
Rule
801.1(c)
Agree, The first potentially reportable event would be the purchase of 100% interest in the portfolio. (N. Ovuka, T. Hancock and R. Smith concur)
HSR Informal Interpretations

0010003 Informal Interpretation

… 0010003 Informal Interpretation 0010003 Informal Interpretation … 4, 2000 VIA FACSIMILE Thomas F. Hancock, Esquire Premerger Notification Office Bureau of Competition Room 303 6th Street and Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washing ton, D.C. 20580 Dear …
Date
Rule
801.2(d), 801.40, 802.40
Unknown
HSR Informal Interpretations

0010004 Informal Interpretation

… 0010004 Informal Interpretation 0010004 Informal Interpretation [redacted] October 6, 2000 BY FACSIMILE AND FIRST CLASS MAIL Mr. Michael Verne Premerger Notification Office Bureau of Competition, Room 303 …
Date
Rule
Formal Interpretation 15
Agree - LLC is not $10 MM person & is its own UPE
HSR Informal Interpretations

0010005 Informal Interpretation

… 0010005 Informal Interpretation 0010005 Informal Interpretation [redacted] October 6, 2000 BY FACSIMILE AND FIRST CLASS MAIL Mr. Michael Verne Premerger Notification Office Bureau of Competition, Room 303 …
Date
Rule
Formal Interpretation 15
Agree - LLC is not $10 MM person & is its own UPE
HSR Informal Interpretations

0010006 Informal Interpretation

… 0010006 Informal Interpretation 0010006 Informal Interpretation …   HSR interpretation HI Mike - I would appreciate your guidance on the following fact pattern: Facts: A and B wish to engage in a business combination. A will be …
Date
Rule
801.2
As a result of the consolidation C would be attributed the assets/revenue of A & B and would be a $100 MM person. $10 MM shareholders of A & B would have potential filing obligation.
HSR Informal Interpretations

0010007 Informal Interpretation

… 0010007 Informal Interpretation 0010007 Informal Interpretation … October 10, 2000 Mike Verne Federal Trade Commission Washington, D.C. 20580 Re: HSR Question Dear Mike: As a follow up … the following is a summary of the transaction in question and your answer to the question posed. In the transaction in …
Date
Rule
801.2
Advised the writer that it was unlikely that the FTC would seek civil penalties against holding company if a shareholder acquired it voting stock in violation of the ACT.
HSR Informal Interpretations

0010008 Informal Interpretation

… 0010008 Informal Interpretation 0010008 Informal Interpretation … As a follow-up, it appears that shareholders of both A and B will have a filing obligation as they will acquire in excess of $15 million …
Date
Rule
801.2(d), 802.41
Either A or B should file & include information from both companies. Two certification are require.
HSR Informal Interpretations

0010009 Informal Interpretation

… 0010009 Informal Interpretation 0010009 Informal Interpretation … have restructured the transaction so that now A will be merged with and into B. Since neither A nor B is a $100 person, there is …
Date
Rule
802.1(c)
Advised the writer that in a merger, B would file only with respect to the operations and would not include A.
Early Termination Notices

20005085: H Group Holding, Inc.; Eli Lilly and Company

… 20005085: H Group Holding, Inc.; Eli Lilly and Company HSR Early … Notice 20005085: H Group Holding, Inc.; Eli Lilly and Company 20005085 Eli Lilly and Company Eli Lilly and …
Date
Acquiring Party
H Group Holding, Inc.
Acquired Party
Eli Lilly and Company
Acquired Entities
Eli Lilly and Company
Displaying 34401 - 34420 of 45718
Return to top