Business Blog
FTC bids good night to deceptive day trading earnings claims
For people looking to gain a financial foothold, promises of $100,000 or more in “verified profits” in “under 45 days” are understandably alluring. But all too often what begins as a Siren’s Song ends in a Swan Song as people lose their life savings to the promoters of bogus schemes. The FTC has announced a $3 million settlement with an outfit known as Warrior Trading and its CEO Ross Cameron for using allegedly misleading investment claims to convince consumers to shell out hundreds or even thousands of dollars for a trading “system” that left most of them on the financial rocks.
Massachusetts-based Warrior Trading pitched its programs as “a quick and simple way to get your dream of day-trading success going.” The defendants weren’t talking about a little pocket money on the side. Consider the kind of claims they made on their website:
- “Learn How I Made over $101,280.47 in Verified Profits Day Trading Part Time in Under 45 Days Using 3 Simple Strategies that You Can Use Immediately to Increase profits and Reduce Losses NOW!”
- “Start trading over my shoulder side-by-side with me because I guarantee you that next week, the week after, the week after that, I’ll be trading the one or two stocks each day that move up 20 to 30 percent.”
Warrior Trading initially steered consumers to a “FREE Day Trading Webinar,” but the FTC says that’s where any semblance of “free” ended. Next came the spiel to shell out cash for more “programs” that supposedly taught people how to “easily find the right stocks to trade” so they could “produce big winners.” According to the complaint, that was the fantasy, but here are the facts. The FTC says most customer accounts actually lost money, meaning that people took a financial hit both on the defendants’ “programs” and on their trading losses.
The complaint charges Warrior Trading and Cameron with violations of the FTC Act and the Telemarketing Sales Rule. In addition to injunctive provisions, the settlement will return $3 million to consumers who lost money due to the defendants’ deception.
The case serves as a reminder to prospective entrepreneurs about the risks posed by fast-talking, fast-money pitch people who use deceptive earning claims to sell their investment “systems.”
It’s also an opportunity to update promoters on recent initiatives related to money-making claims. In addition to law enforcement actions challenging misleading earnings claims, the FTC has sent Notices of Penalty Offenses to 1,100 businesses, letting them know that future misrepresentations could trigger hefty financial penalties. The FTC also has announced an Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking concerning false, misleading, and unsubstantiated earnings claims.
It is your choice whether to submit a comment. If you do, you must create a user name, or we will not post your comment. The Federal Trade Commission Act authorizes this information collection for purposes of managing online comments. Comments and user names are part of the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) public records system, and user names also are part of the FTC’s computer user records system. We may routinely use these records as described in the FTC’s Privacy Act system notices. For more information on how the FTC handles information that we collect, please read our privacy policy.
The purpose of this blog and its comments section is to inform readers about Federal Trade Commission activity, and share information to help them avoid, report, and recover from fraud, scams, and bad business practices. Your thoughts, ideas, and concerns are welcome, and we encourage comments. But keep in mind, this is a moderated blog. We review all comments before they are posted, and we won’t post comments that don’t comply with our commenting policy. We expect commenters to treat each other and the blog writers with respect.
We don't edit comments to remove objectionable content, so please ensure that your comment contains none of the above. The comments posted on this blog become part of the public domain. To protect your privacy and the privacy of other people, please do not include personal information. Opinions in comments that appear in this blog belong to the individuals who expressed them. They do not belong to or represent views of the Federal Trade Commission.
Ten years too late, and too little! But at least finally the FTC is doing something. Emphasis on the "at least", but better than nothin!
...Now how do I get my money back from the $3 million dollars settlement???!!! That's another story...