Federal Trade Commission
Protecting America's Consumers
The North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners, Plaintiff-Appellant v. Federal Trade Commission, Defendant-Appellee.
(United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina and United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit)
Case Nos. 5:11-cv-49-FL and 11-1679
FTC File Nos. D-9343 and 081 0137
[Related Adjudicative Proceeding]
June 4, 2013
- Decision Denying Appellant North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners’ Petition for Review of the Commission Order Finding that the Board Violated the FTC Act
- News Release
July 27, 2012
-
Brief of Respondent Federal Trade Commission
November 28, 2011
-
Brief of Defendant-Appellee Federal Trade Commission
October 6, 2011
- Brief of Appellant North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners
June 27, 2011
May 3, 2011
- Order Granting Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss
April 7, 2011
- Reply to Plaintiff’s Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss
March 24, 2011
- Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss and Attachment(s) Thereto
March 14, 2011
- Order Staying Proceeding Pending Decision on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss
February 28, 2011
- Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss
- Memorandum of Law in Support of Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss
February 23, 2011
- Joint Status Report and Proposed Discovery Plan
February 9, 2011
- Order Denying Plaintiff’s Motion for Temporary Restraining Order
February 8, 2011
- Plaintiff’s Reply Memorandum in Support of Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Other Equitable Relief and Exhibit A Thereto
February 7, 2011
- Opposition of the Federal Trade Commission to Plaintiff’s Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Other Equitable Relief
February 4, 2011
- Plaintiff’s Motion and Memorandum in Support of Motion for Expedited Relief
February 2, 2011
- Plaintiff’s Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Other Equitable Relief
- Memorandum in Support of Plaintiff’s Motion for Temporary Restraining Order, Preliminary Injunction, and Permanent Injunction, and Exhibits A and B Thereto