Skip to main content
Date
Rule
803.2 (Item 1(j))
Staff
Wayne Kaplan
Response/Comments
No written response.

Question

(redacted)

April 15, 1985

Wayne Kaplan, Esq.
Federal Trade Commission
Bureau of Competition
Washington, D.C. 20580

Transaction (redacted) acquisition of voting securities of (redacted)

Dear Mr. Kaplan:

This confirms our conversation of April 15, 1985 in which you indicated that it would not be necessary for us to amend the above referenced filing.

I had raised this issue with you with reference to Item 1j of the Premerger Notification Form, based on the fact that the corporate structure which was actually in place at the time of the acquisition varied from that described in Item 1j. Because the ultimate parent remained the same, you advised me that it was not necessary to file such an amendment because there appeared to be no antitrust ramifications in the revised structure.

I appreciate your assistance on this matter.

Sincerely,

(redacted)

(redacted)

About Informal Interpretations

Informal interpretations provide guidance from previous staff interpretations on the applicability of the HSR rules to specific fact situations. You should not rely on them as a substitute for reading the Act and the Rules themselves. These materials do not, and are not intended to, constitute legal advice.

Learn more about Informal Interpretations.