In the Matter of Nectar Brand LLC, also d/b/a Nectar Sleep; Dreamcloud, LLC; and Dreamcloud Brand LLC, File No. 1823038 #00006

Submission Number:
00006
Commenter:
Cliff Olsen
State:
Pennsylvania
Initiative Name:
In the Matter of Nectar Brand LLC, also d/b/a Nectar Sleep; Dreamcloud, LLC; and Dreamcloud Brand LLC, File No. 1823038
Original Message----- From: [REDACTED] Sent: Friday, April 06, 2018 1:53 AM To: DEbrief Subject: In re Nectar Brand LLC Whereas the news / blog page says public comments are accepted until 4/12/2018, my public comment should be incorporated in the proposed settlement resulting in a new settlement. I object to the proposed settlement because Nectar Brand LLC does not admit to selling products imported from China. I think they must. I object to the proposed settlement because there is no mention of contacting, in any form or media, people who have purchased the Chinese products nor offered a refund based on the false advertising. I object to the proposed settlement because there is no mention of their products, past or future, being labeled with the country of origin which should me a non-removable origin statement affixed or printed on the imported items. I object to the proposed settlement because, while bankruptcy petitions and insolvency are mentioned, there is no prevention of selling the company assets to themselves or tracking the old owners or just plain changing the name of the LLC to avoid the 20 year oversight required by the ruling. I object to the proposed settlement because this is no financial loss to the company, except for the cost of lawyers, which the American taxpayers bore (sp?) to investigate this event. IMO, a new settlement is warranted. cliff olsen [REDACTED] https://www.ftc.gov/enforcement/cases-proceedings/182-3038/nectar-brand-llc