Outside the United States
In the Matter of Carrot Neurotechnology, Inc., File No. 1423132
I believe that the application developed by Carrott Neurotechnology is fully supported by a high number of studies. Thus I cannot see why this application would be considered as not supported by empirical evidence. In addition, by applying the hypothesized legal act, future researchers would be extremely discouraged from trying to translate their basic research results into valid and scientifically solid practical applications. For the abovementioned reasons, I ask that the legal act against Carrott Nanotherapy should be reconsidered.