In the Matter of Carrot Neurotechnology, Inc., File No. 1423132 #00012

Submission Number:
00012
Commenter:
B. Glenn Stanley
State:
California
Initiative Name:
In the Matter of Carrot Neurotechnology, Inc., File No. 1423132
The standard of "scientific" proof being required in this case is in my expert opinion excessive and unwarranted. Specifically, that proof of the claims be based on "randomized, double-blind" studies, sets the highest possible standard of what is scientifically valid. A reasonable standard is publication in respected peer-reviewed scientific journals, a standard that has been achieved and indeed exceeded in this case.