Business Opportunity Rule #522418-11387

Submission Number:
522418-11387
Commenter:
MICHELLE PLISKA
State:
MN
Initiative Name:
Business Opportunity Rule
I THINK ANYONE THAT WANTS TO GET INTO A BUSINESS SHOULD BE EDUCATED, BUT IT SHOULD BE ON THEIR OWN TIMEFRAME, RIGHT AWAY OR EVEN WAIT AWHILE, NOT MANDATED TO WAIT 7 DAYS. FOR SOME, THIS COULD MEAN A HUGE LOSS OF BUSINESS. 7 DAYS IS A LONG TIME TO WAIT IN THE WORLD OF BUSINESS. ESPECIALLY, AND INTERNET BUSINESS. I THINK IT VERY INAPROPRIATE TO DISCLOSE HOW MUCH INCOME WAS MADE ON EACH DIFFERENT LEVEL. EVERY BUSINESS IS ON EACH INDIVIDUALS TERMS, THEREFORE, THE MORE SOMEONE WORKS, THE MORE THEY GET PAID. ANY ONE PERSONS INCOME IN THIS BUSINESS IS NEVER THE SAME AND SHOULD REMAIN PRIVATE, AS THE INCOME IS REFLECTED IN THE BUSINESS OWNERS' WORK ETHIC. IT IS UNFAIR TO A NEW BUSINESS OWNER TO LET THEM THINK THAT ALL THEY CAN MAKE IN THEIR FIRST MONTH OF BUSINESS IS $100.00. (MY FIRST MONTH'S PAY), WHEN IN FACT, THEY ARE DRIVEN TO ACHIEVE MORE. IT IS LIKE GETTING PAID COMMISSIONS BASED ON THE THE GUY THAT HIRED YOU, WHEN YOU HAVE THE POTENTIAL TO PRODUCE SUBSTANTIALLY MORE! AS FAR AS PAST LITIGATIONS ARE CONCERNED, I THINK THAT ANYONE WHO WANTS TO KNOW, SHOULD KNOW, BUT SOME OF THE PAST HAS BEEN OVER AND DONE WITH OVER 20 YEARS AGO, WHEN THIS COMPANY WAS A TOTALLY DIFFERENT BUSINESS. ANY SUCCESSFUL BUSINESS OUT THERE, HAS HAD OR WILL HAVE LITIGATION ACTIVITY. IF THE BUSINESS REMAINS IN GOOD STANDING WITH THE BETTER BUSINESS BUREAU, THE FTC AND THE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, THEN WHY IS IT NECESSARY TO DISCLOSE ALL PAST LITIGATIONS. ESPECIALLY WHEN THE COMPANY HAS WON THEM? IF ANY ONE COMPANY HAS THAT MANY LITIGATION FAILURES, THEN WOULDN'T THEY LOSE THEIR STATUS IN THE ABOVE MENTIONED ORGANIZATIONS? IF ANY COMPANY IS THAT BAD WITH LITIGATIONS, THEN WHY WOULD THE BBC, FTC, COC ALLOW THEM TO STILL DO BUSINESS? I WOULD THINK THAT INDEPENDANT BUSINESS OWNERS SHOULD MAYBE INVESTIGATE THOSE ORGANIZATIONS MORE THAN THE COMPANY THEY WISH TO DO BUSINESS WITH. LASTLY, IF EVERYONE GOT INTO BUSINESS BASED ON WHAT OTHERS DID OR DIDN'T DO, THEN, NO ONE WOULD GO INTO BUSINESS. BECAUSE EACH INDIVIDUAL BUSINESS OWNER HAS DIFFERENT WORK ETHICS AND PRINCIPALS ON HOW THEY DO THAT BUSINESS, IT IS NOT FAIR TO HAVE A NEW BUSINESS OWNER BE SUBJECT TO THE SOLE OPINIONS OF OTHER IBO'S WHO MAY NOT BE REALLY WORKING THE BUSINESS. WHETHER OR NOT SOMEONE DECIDES TO GO INTO BUSINESS, SHOULD BE BASED ON THEIR OWN GOALS AND DREAMS, NOT SOMEONE ELSE'S. WE DO HAVE A 6 MONTH GUARANTEE IF IT DOESN'T WORK FOR THEM, WHY SHOULD THEY BE SABATOGED BEFORE THEY EVEN HAVE A CHANCE TO FIND OUT?