Business Blog
An open statement about BCP closing letters
The FTC takes a practical approach to its mission of protecting America’s consumers. That typically means law enforcement actions to challenge companies’ unfair or deceptive acts or practices. But depending on the facts, we may supplement law enforcement with other methods, including consumer education, business guidance, warning letters, national workshops, reports, and – in limited circumstances – staff closing letters.
Closing letters from the staff of the Bureau of Consumer Protection are just what they say they are. They’re letters from FTC staff telling a company or individual that we’re closing our investigation into their conduct. Closing letters aren’t binding on the Commission and the text of the letters makes it clear that the FTC reserves the right to take further action as the public interest may require.
There are a number of practical reasons why staff may close an investigation even when there is concern that a company has violated the law. That’s why closing letters also expressly state that the receipt of a letter shouldn’t be construed as a determination that there wasn’t a law violation.
Even though staff closing letters serve a narrow purpose, it’s still wise for businesses and attorneys to read them. They’ll often include a pointer that can help other companies with their own compliance efforts. Just be sure to read them on the Staff Closing Letters page on the FTC website. Why? Over the years, we’ve heard reports about companies falsifying or altering FTC documents – including correspondence, civil investigative demands, and even staff closing letters. If you see a closing letter anywhere other than on the FTC website, the best way to be sure you’re looking at a genuine document is to check if it’s published on ftc.gov.
It is your choice whether to submit a comment. If you do, you must create a user name, or we will not post your comment. The Federal Trade Commission Act authorizes this information collection for purposes of managing online comments. Comments and user names are part of the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) public records system, and user names also are part of the FTC’s computer user records system. We may routinely use these records as described in the FTC’s Privacy Act system notices. For more information on how the FTC handles information that we collect, please read our privacy policy.
The purpose of this blog and its comments section is to inform readers about Federal Trade Commission activity, and share information to help them avoid, report, and recover from fraud, scams, and bad business practices. Your thoughts, ideas, and concerns are welcome, and we encourage comments. But keep in mind, this is a moderated blog. We review all comments before they are posted, and we won’t post comments that don’t comply with our commenting policy. We expect commenters to treat each other and the blog writers with respect.
We don't edit comments to remove objectionable content, so please ensure that your comment contains none of the above. The comments posted on this blog become part of the public domain. To protect your privacy and the privacy of other people, please do not include personal information. Opinions in comments that appear in this blog belong to the individuals who expressed them. They do not belong to or represent views of the Federal Trade Commission.