Letters to app developers caution against info surprises

Share This Page

There could be exceptions to the rule – maybe an unexpected bonus or an out-of-the-blue call from a friend – but as a general proposition, people don’t like surprises. As letters the FTC staff just sent to mobile app developers suggest, people really don’t like surprises about the information their apps gather. And the kind of data those apps had the capacity to collect may come as a surprise even to savvy industry members.

The letters went to developers of apps that use software development kits created by a company called Silverpush. Silverpush offers tools that include something called “Unique Audio Beacon” technology.

What can the audio beacon do? If there’s a TV on near a phone that has the app installed, the beacon can use the phone’s microphone to detect signals embedded in certain TV programs. Running silently in the background even if the person isn’t using the app, the technology could allow Silverpush to generate a log of a person’s TV viewing that could be used for ad targeting or analytics.

According to FTC staff, the developers who got the letters use code that looks a lot like Silverpush’s audio beacon technology. (The letters explain in more detail other clues about how the apps are configured that suggest they might have that capability.) But nowhere did we see disclosures to consumers about the audio beacon’s functionality.

For now, Silverpush is saying that no TV shows currently aimed at U.S. households are embedded with the code necessary to activate the audio beacon. But the letters make it clear that if an app allows third parties to monitor U.S. consumers’ TV-viewing habits – and its statements or user interfaces state or imply otherwise – that could constitute a violation of the FTC Act.

After suggesting that developers read Marketing Your Mobile App: Get It Right From the Start, the letters end with the verbal equivalent of that point-to-our-eyes and then point-to-you universal symbol for “We’re monitoring this.”

The big-picture message for businesses is to avoid data surprises. It’s unwise to collect information that consumers wouldn’t expect. Furthermore, if you use software tools developed by other companies, ultimately you’re still responsible for explaining your app’s functionality to consumers.



I heard a strange noise coming from the Verizon Cable box yesterday when it and the TV were off; so I turned cut power to it and the noise stopped. The wireless phone from the bundled service was two rooms away.

It appears that under the current electronic evolution the respect for our constitutional rights have been ignored. There is no expectations of privacy for the American people when using electronic equipment. Why in God's name would a commission not acknowledg the danger of putting equipment on the market that was not safe to begin with?. Lowering the standards and deregulation was not the answer to competition and innovation. Ignoring the facts that have guided the entire us of electronic communications equipment and reality of what the dangers are was a very serious violation of the laws of nature. It took years before the development of equipment that was safe holds the key to the protection of the equipment that is sold to the American people. It was not our choice or decision to trade off our safety and security of our telecommunications service for a digital transition systems. It was the combination of the development using electronic equipment that make the difference in how we use electronics. However,the reality of this current communications system is that millions of American families have their service disconnected and handed over to retailers who are profiting from the sales of foreign made equipment that American families are being forced to buy. That was never the intention of the agree between companies and customers.

Add new comment

Comment Policy

Privacy Act Statement

It is your choice whether to submit a comment. If you do, you must create a user name, or we will not post your comment. The Federal Trade Commission Act authorizes this information collection for purposes of managing online comments. Comments and user names are part of the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) public records system (PDF), and user names also are part of the FTC’s computer user records system (PDF). We may routinely use these records as described in the FTC’s Privacy Act system notices. For more information on how the FTC handles information that we collect, please read our privacy policy.