Not another lawyer joke

Share This Page

We try to keep a sense of humor about lawyer jokes, but given the harm to consumers, it's no laughing matter when debt collectors mimic attorneys.  The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and the FTC Act establish that it's illegal for debt collectors to falsely claim to be attorneys or to suggest a bogus connection to law enforcement.  An FTC settlement with an outfit called Goldman Schwartz and related companies puts the whole kit and kaboodle out of the debt collection business from now until, well, forever.

The Houston-based companies did business nationwide, collecting primarily on payday loans.  In some cases, they owned the debt;  in others, they acted as third-party collectors. The FTC complaint alleged an unsavory all-you-can-eat salad bar of law violations: using obscene language; placing harassing calls at all hours; falsely claiming that people would get locked up, lose their disability payments, or forfeit their drivers’ licenses; illegally telling employers and military superiors about debts; threatening that people’s kids would be taken into custody – and that’s just for starters.

Then there were the false claims about being attorneys.  Maybe just an isolated overreach by a rogue employee?  No chance.  To solicit business, here’s what the defendants flat-out said on their website:

The last call your debtor wants is from a lawyer's office giving them the legal alternatives if they don’t pay you! Our legal staff will remind the debtor of the ramifications a lawsuit may involve, such as depositions, liens, writs of execution, and the waste of time and money spent on their attorney’s hourly billing. Specializing in commercial collections, the legal staff of our legal collection office will approach your debtor from the legal point of view not allowed to traditional collection agencies. GOLDMAN SCHWARTZ has the legal muscle relationships to get you paid, typically with forty percent more bottom line than traditional agencies.

The all caps were the company's, by the way.  The defendants often used the name "Goldman Schwartz" or "Goldman Schwartz Lieberman & Stein" despite that fact that no one who worked for the company was named Goldman, Schwartz, Lieberman, or Stein.  Hmmm.

The FTC says the defendants went a step further and squeezed people for unauthorized fees.  They even had an in-house nickname for it:  “Juice.”  Cute.

The good news for consumers is that the whole crowd is banned for life from debt collection and a court-appointed Receiver is winding down the business.  The owner of the operation – a guy named Gerald Wright who sometimes claimed to be an attorney named Barry Goldman – will surrender his assets, estimated to be worth $550,000, to pay restitution to people who were charged unauthorized fees.  The rest of the $1.4 million judgment against Wright is suspended based on his inability to pay, as is the financial judgment against managers Starlette Foster and Jennifer Zamora.  Of course, if it turns out the defendants gave false information about their finances, the remaining amount will come due.

The message for debt collectors:  The terms of the FDCPA and a long list of FTC actions establish clear lines separating lawful activity from sleazy tactics.  Don’t say you haven’t been warned.



Nice writing laughter keeps us focused on how sad the industry has become over the lack of over site over the past 20 years.
You guys are doing an incredible job! You all deserve much more appreciation for the wonderful work your doing on behalf of the consumer. This is the kind of thing that the media should be headlining instead of some celebrities affairs. I have a suggestion about another area that needs a great deal of attention. It's the uncontrolled telemarketers who use voip and robo dialers. There's no way to get any information in order to fill out a complaint on your website. As a consumer on a fixed income I can't afford to buy the equipment necessary in order to block these people that violate the "DO NOT CALL" list. Thank-you again for the great work you do for us.

You cannot be serious? FTC TELLS you they do nothing to stop the violators of the do not call list. In fact, the FTC promotes more of the same by CHARGING telemarketers upwards of $16,714 to get the lists of those who want to comply. Since non-compliance has little or no financial risk and compliance costs big money, telemarketers take their chances by violating or circumventing the law. Seriously, the FTC IS A FULL ON JOKE AND SHOULD BE DISBANDED.

Add new comment

Comment Policy

Privacy Act Statement

It is your choice whether to submit a comment. If you do, you must create a user name, or we will not post your comment. The Federal Trade Commission Act authorizes this information collection for purposes of managing online comments. Comments and user names are part of the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) public records system (PDF), and user names also are part of the FTC’s computer user records system (PDF). We may routinely use these records as described in the FTC’s Privacy Act system notices. For more information on how the FTC handles information that we collect, please read our privacy policy.