Six myths about filing comments with the FTC

Share This Page

You’ve seen the sentence when the FTC announces that it’s thinking about putting a new rule in place or changing what’s already on the books: “Interested parties are invited to submit comments. . . .”.  The alphabet soup of the administrative process can be a bit daunting at first: ANPR (Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking), FRN (Federal Register Notice), CFR (Code of Federal Regulations), SBP (Statement of Basis and Purpose). When it comes to the rulemaking process at the FTC, here are six common myths — and the straight scoop.

“Filing public comments is for the Washington wingtip crowd.”  Comments from D.C-based groups and inside-the-Beltway movers and shakers are as welcome as any others, but proposed FTC rules affect consumers and businesses across the country. Agencies need to hear from people who don’t work on lettered streets across from national monuments. Simply put, geographic diversity of viewpoint makes for better policies.

“The government doesn’t want to hear what we have to say.”  Not true. Maybe some people enjoy listening to a choir made up of all sopranos (especially if they’re sopranos). But most people appreciate harmonies that reflect divergent voices. The FTC’s like that, too. That’s why it’s important for a broad range of interested people to participate in the process: consumers, businesses, non-profits, academics, local, state, and federal agencies, and anyone else with a perspective to share.

“What could we possibly add to the conversation?”  A lot. Nobody knows better than business executives what’s really going on in their industry. Or perhaps you’re a professor who’s studied the sector and has research to share. And who better than consumers and groups representing them to offer real-world perspectives on issues that affect their pocketbook? You can’t assume your voice will be heard unless you’re the one who speaks up.

“Why bother? They’ve already made up their minds.”  Again, not true — and there’s proof to back that up. Here’s how the rulemaking process usually works: The FTC publishes a proposal, people send in comments, and then after studying what’s been filed, the FTC issues a final rule. Usually accompanying the final rule is a lengthy document that discusses the comments the agency received and how those comments affected its thinking. So there it is in black and white: proof that public comments can and do change minds and shape policy.

“Nobody reads those comments.”  Oh, yes, they do. And FTC staffers have the squint to prove it. In addition, the FTC posts on the website the comments it gets, so people all over the world can read them.

“The process is too complicated.”  Then you haven’t checked out the FTC’s online public comment system. Those “footnotes in triplicate” days are long gone. Filing a public comment is as easy as a point and a click. That means you can spend more time thinking about the substance and less time fretting about filing.

Next:  More myths about the process



I have recently been informed that school loans and many other loans in default are being left open by Congressional decree. This concerns me as a former student with student loans that have become delinquent through no fault of mine own. Our state of Louisiana went through a period of political upheaval and consequently due to Republicans taking over the state and changing every law that they disapproved of, until no common Louisiana resident knows the laws anymore and cannot get representation anymore. I followed the Federal laws as well as I could, but to no avail. The Republicans have formed a band to write state laws that that they claim will supercede Federal laws. They made it impossible for me to find any work commensurate to my major due to my being Democratic and was aided by a Democratic Governor to complete my education. Plus, they made Louisiana a "right to work" state which is a misnomer. It essentially a "right to fire" law that gives business the right to fire without due cause. They basically put me into a series of parttime/temporary jobs at less than minimum wage with no opportunity to get out of their clutches. I personally know many Politicians and Government Employees who have told me as much. This has come to this dilemma: I cannot pay these loans and will die owing thousands of dollars that will never be paid and the interest will never grows exponentially every day. I am now 73 years old, and disabled completely. Very soon I will have to go to assisted living or a nursing home to die. However these debts are keeping me from being admitted. Now, are we a country of debtors prisons or not? How else can we describe this mess that has evolved?

Add new comment

Comment Policy

Privacy Act Statement

It is your choice whether to submit a comment. If you do, you must create a user name, or we will not post your comment. The Federal Trade Commission Act authorizes this information collection for purposes of managing online comments. Comments and user names are part of the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) public records system (PDF), and user names also are part of the FTC’s computer user records system (PDF). We may routinely use these records as described in the FTC’s Privacy Act system notices. For more information on how the FTC handles information that we collect, please read our privacy policy.