Skip to main content
Date
Rule
7A(c)(1), 802.2(b)
Staff
As we discussed, the relevant Hart-Scott materials include Section 7A(c) (1) of the act, exemptingrealty acquisitions in the ordinary course of business, and Proposed Rules 802.2(b), 50 Red. Reg.38742, 38758 (1985), which I understand embodies the current
Response/Comments
None noted

Question

(redacted)

July 11, 1988

BY HAND DELIVERY

Victor L. Cohen
Premerger Notification Office
Bureau of Competition
Federal Trade Commission
6th & Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Room 303
Washington, D.C. 20580

Dear Victor:

As we recently discussed on the telephone, I am requesting the Premerger Offices informal opinion on the reportability of the following transaction.

Our client (redacted), an employee benefit plan, intends to acquire the (redacted) in Washington, D.C. For approximately $35 million from (redacted) a partnership controlled by the (redacted) . The (redacted) is acquiring the hotel for investment purposes in the ordinary course of its business of buying and selling financial instruments and real estate properties for its investment portfolio. The (redacted) is regulated under (redacted) and makes investments solely for the purpose of preserving pension assets and funding pension obligations. (Redacted), likewise, routinely buys and sells real estate properties, such as hotels, in the ordinary course of its business in managing its investment portfolio.

As we discussed, the relevant Hart-Scott materials include Section 7A(c) (1) of the act, exempting realty acquisitions in the ordinary course of business, and Proposed Rules 802.2(b), 50 Red. Reg. 38742, 38758 (1985), which I understand embodies the current informal interpretations used by the Staff. Proposed 802.2(b) exempts certain acquisitions of office buildings or residential properties because, as explained in the Statement of Basis and Purpose:

It is unlikely that acquisition of property named in proposed 802.2 would
have any significant potential to increase market power. The low risk of
anticompetitive transactions is a result of the widely dispersed holding of
these resources as well as the small size of Typical transactions relative to
the total amount of resources.

50 Fed. Reg. At 38756. It is submitted that similar policy considerations should apply here to the acquisition of a hotel aby the (redacted) and that no Hart-Scott filing should be required.

I appreciate your time and attention. If I can provide you with any additional pertinent information, please give me a call.

Sincerely,

(Redacted)

cc:(redacted)

About Informal Interpretations

Informal interpretations provide guidance from previous staff interpretations on the applicability of the HSR rules to specific fact situations. You should not rely on them as a substitute for reading the Act and the Rules themselves. These materials do not, and are not intended to, constitute legal advice.

Learn more about Informal Interpretations.