Skip to main content
Date
Rule
802.20
Staff
John M. Sipple, Jr.
Response/Comments
None noted

Question

(redacted)

May 3, 1988

BY FEDERAL EXPRESS

John M. Sipple
Premerger Notification Office
Bureau of Competition
Federal Trade Commission
6th & Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Room 303
Washington, D.C. 20580

(Redacted)

Dear John:

I am writing to confirm our telephone conversation today and the conclusion that no HSR filings are required in connection with (redacted) joint venture

As we discussed (redacted) will be formed and announced on May 10, 1988. (Redacted) will be a Delaware, not-for-profit, non-stock membership corporation established to conduct operating software research and development which will be made available at non-discriminatory license fees to any interested party. The initial discriminatory license fees to any interested party. The initial Sponsors of (redacted) are (redacted) Each of these Sponsors has agreed to contribute $3 million per year for a three-year period, and to contribute an additional $1.5 million per year during that same three-year period if later requested by (redacted)

I reviewed with you the two separate HSR exemptions that apply to (redacted) and its four Sponsors, and our conclusion that therefore no HSR filings are required. First, 802.20 applies because no Sponsor holds voting securities and assets of the joint venture in excess of $15 million (the total value of each sponsors interest, including all committed future contributions, is $13.5 million) and because no Sponsor holds voting securities which confer control of the issuer (each of the four Sponsors has a 25% interest in (redacted). Second, 802.40 applies because (redacted) will be established as a not-for-profit research and development joint venture which qualifies under 501(c) (6) of the Internal Revenue Code. I noted that (redacted) cannot obtain an advance ruling from the IRS regarding this qualification, but we believe that it clearly falls within 501(c) (6), and therefore should be exempt from HSR filing under 802.40.

Upon reviewing these facts and exemptions, you confirmed our conclusion that HSR filing was not required under these circumstances. Although I know that it is your general policy, I emphasize again our request for confidentiality regarding this matter.

I appreciate your cooperation in responding to my inquiry.

Very truly yours,

(redacted)

(redacted)

About Informal Interpretations

Informal interpretations provide guidance from previous staff interpretations on the applicability of the HSR rules to specific fact situations. You should not rely on them as a substitute for reading the Act and the Rules themselves. These materials do not, and are not intended to, constitute legal advice.

Learn more about Informal Interpretations.