Skip to main content
Date
Rule
801.40
Staff
Patrick Sharpe
Response/Comments
Called (redacted) 11-10-86. I concur

Question

(redacted)

November 4, 1986

Mr. Patrick Sharpe
Premerger Notification Office
Bureau of Competition
Room 303
6th Street & Pennsylvania Ave., N.W.
Federal Trade Commission
Washington, D.C. 20580

Re: (redacted)

Dear Mr. Sharpe:

This letter is to confirm our telephone conversation of November 3, 1986 in which you informed (redacted) and me that it is the Federal Trade Commissions position that partnerships are their own ultimate parent entities and, therefore, the assets and income of the partners are not considered in determining whether a filing is required under Title II of the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 (the Act).

*Premerger Office position

In the transaction in question, the assets of (redacted) will be purchased by a limited partnership. The limited partnership will not be 100% owned by or attributable to any one individual. The assets of the limited partnership will be less than $10,000,000. Therefore, the acquiring entity will not meet the minimum size requirements of the Act, and a filing under the Act will not be necessary.

If our understanding of the FTCs position that only the assets of the partnership, and not those of the partners, are taken into account in determining the size of the acquiring person for purpose of the Act is not correct, we would appreciate it if you would notify us immediately.

Your assistance in this matter is greatly appreciated.

Very truly yours,

(redacted)

(redacted)

cc: (redacted)

 

(redacted)

About Informal Interpretations

Informal interpretations provide guidance from previous staff interpretations on the applicability of the HSR rules to specific fact situations. You should not rely on them as a substitute for reading the Act and the Rules themselves. These materials do not, and are not intended to, constitute legal advice.

Learn more about Informal Interpretations.