Skip to main content
Date
Rule
803.5; Item 1(c); Item 2(a)
Staff
Wayne Kaplan
Response/Comments
7/26/83. RE: Letter of July 14, 1983. Letter is correct but we hereby ask forcopies of exemption request & send letter if request granted. We assign # and giveC5 letter & when - exemption granted we wipe it off books (i.e. computer). Nosummary sheet prepared. Purpose is to avoid compliance letter in case someonepicks up transaction in press or elsewhere & asks about it. I spoke to (redacted) &he will have (redacted) follow above procedure. Wayne Kaplan. 7/26/83.

Question

(redacted)

July 21, 1983

BY TELECOPIER

Dana Abrahamsen, Esq.
Premerger Notification Office
Federal Trade Commission
Washington, D.C. 20580

    Re: Informal Advice

Dear Dana:

During our conversation on July 20, 1983, you rendered informal advice as to the following questions:

1. Where an acquiring person is making a reportable purchase of voting securities and is also purchasing warrants to acquire additional voting securities, may the filing be made for the higher threshold which would be crossed upon exercise of the warrants?

You responded that, where a person has a good faith present intention to cross

any threshold, the filing can be made for a higher threshold which may be crossed

pursuant to the exercise of such warrants. Consequently, the acquiring person may

exercise such warrants at any time during the year following expiration of the

applicable waiting period without making a new filing.

2. What is the proper method of responding to Items 2(e) and 3 when reporting the purchase of voting securities and warrants that upon exercise result in the acquisition of voting securities?

The response should separately reflect the purchase of: (i) voting securities, together with the consideration to be paid for such securities; and (ii) warrants, setting forth the required information as to the additional voting securities to be acquired upon their exercise.

3. Where a letter of intent has not indicated the number of shares to be acquired by each of two acquiring persons and only one of the acquiring persons will be making a reportable purchase, how should such information be reflected in the filing?

You indicated that as to Item 1(c), both acquiring persons should be identified. In the course of the describing the transaction in response to Item 2(a), it should be explained that only one of the acquiring persons is making a reportable acquisition.

4. Where a letter of intent has been entered into by an issuer (the acquired person) and the letter of intent makes reference to both a purchase of voting securities from the issuer and a purchase of voting securities from an officer of the acquired person, is it necessary to give notice to the issuer and supply an affidavit pursuant to 803.5(a)?

You responded that where the agreement is between an acquired issuer and the acquiring persons and such agreement includes an reference to a purchase from an officer of the issuer, it is not necessary to give notice and supply a 803.5(a) affidavit. Where, as in the instant situation, most of the voting securities are to be acquired from the issuer and the agreement executed by the acquired issuer makes clear that the issuer has knowledge of the purchase of voting securities from the officer, the transaction would not be considered a 801.30 transaction.

Thank you for your assistance. I believe that the above discussion summarizes the substance of our July 20, 1983 conversation. If it does not, please contact me as soon as possible.

Sincerely,

(redacted)

cc: (redacted)

About Informal Interpretations

Informal interpretations provide guidance from previous staff interpretations on the applicability of the HSR rules to specific fact situations. You should not rely on them as a substitute for reading the Act and the Rules themselves. These materials do not, and are not intended to, constitute legal advice.

Learn more about Informal Interpretations.