Ninth Circuit opinion offers insights into illegal pyramid schemes

Share This Page

It’s an illegal pyramid scheme.  That’s the conclusion reached by a federal appellate court in upholding a trial judge’s ruling in an FTC action challenging a multi-level marketing business operated by BurnLounge, Inc.  If you have clients in the business opportunity arena, the opinion is a must-read.

BurnLounge sold opportunities to run an online digital music store.  But the FTC alleged in its complaint that the defendants were running a pyramid scheme.  One defendant settled, but the remaining parties went to trial.

After a nine-day trial, the District Court agreed that BurnLounge was operating a pyramid scheme and found that more than 56,000 consumers had failed to recoup their investment.  The District Court ordered BurnLounge and its CEO to pay a total of $16.2 million in consumer redress.  Two other individual defendants were ordered to turn over their unjust enrichment from the scheme.  The order barred the defendants from engaging in illegal pyramid sales schemes, Ponzi schemes, chain marketing schemes, and similar operations.  Also prohibited:  misrepresentations about any multi-level marketing or business venture, including claims about sales, income, profitability, or legality.

BurnLounge and two affiliated individuals appealed.  The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit upheld the trial court’s ruling, concluding “We agree with the district court that BurnLounge was an illegal pyramid scheme in violation of the [FTC Act] because BurnLounge’s focus was recruitment, and because the rewards it paid in the form of cash bonuses were tied to recruitment rather than the sale of merchandise.”

The Ninth Circuit held that the FTC presented ample evidence to support the finding that BurnLounge was an illegal pyramid scheme.  In particular, the FTC’s evidence showed that: 1) “Moguls” – members who could earn income – were required to recruit new members to become eligible for all three types of cash bonuses paid by BurnLounge; and 2) Moguls were motivated by the opportunity to earn cash rewards, as shown by data illustrating the sharp difference in package purchasing patterns of Moguls vs. non-Moguls, and by the fact that BurnLounge’s sales plummeted after a preliminary order stopped the Mogul program.

The Ninth Circuit had some interesting things to say about the legal determination of what’s a pyramid scheme.  The Court concluded that the test for establishing a pyramid scheme doesn’t require that the rewards for recruiting others be “completely” unrelated to the sale of products.  Evaluating how BurnLounge operated, the Court observed, “Recruiting was built into the compensation structure in that recruiting led to eligibility for cash rewards, and more recruiting led to higher rewards.” The Court further stated that based on the evidence presented at trial, “Rewards for recruiting were ‘unrelated’ to sales to ultimate users because BurnLounge incentivized recruiting participants, not product sales.”

Bookmark the FTC’s Franchises, Business Opportunities,and  Investments page for compliance resources.



Please answer this question. If you work for a company that pays you an hourly wage and a bonous for how many people attend a presentation then ultimately purchase the product. would this be consiidered a scheme.
Dear Gman00, First of all, the fundamental flaw of MLM is imaginary 'infinities' coupled with real greed and silliness. Second, imagine 'closed-market' (without external income) as a closed room where, let's say, there're 10 (ten) participants who 'invest' $10 (ten) each. So there's 10 x $10 = $100 available. Now when any of participants gets income (takes more than invested $10) then some others will surely break-even or suffer losses, of course. Therefore, the MLM is but a redistribution rip-off plan, a business on so-called 'businessmen,' where a few top-seated milk and drain out million downlines. Third, what exactly are participants paid for in MLM's? Fourth, as FTC says red-herring overpriced goods is no absolution for a fraudulent scheme of license to steal. And so on. All in all, how come that over 90% of MLM 'businessmen' are only self-consuming without biz-op? Furthermore, I do really doubt that you (as millions of 'successful' MLMers) could provide your legit MLM tax returns, right? Too shy ;) Regards.

Add new comment

Comment Policy

Privacy Act Statement

It is your choice whether to submit a comment. If you do, you must create a user name, or we will not post your comment. The Federal Trade Commission Act authorizes this information collection for purposes of managing online comments. Comments and user names are part of the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) public records system (PDF), and user names also are part of the FTC’s computer user records system (PDF). We may routinely use these records as described in the FTC’s Privacy Act system notices. For more information on how the FTC handles information that we collect, please read our privacy policy.