Skip to main content

It’s the oldest trick in the book: Now you see it, now you don’t. This illusion is fine on a Las Vegas stage, but on an online retailer’s website, making negative reviews disappear is hardly magical. The FTC calls it review suppression – and companies engaging in this practice will be held accountable.

In its first case challenging a company’s failure to post negative reviews as a deceptive practice, the FTC has reached a proposed settlement with the California-based fast-fashion retailer Fashion Nova, LLC. Like many online retailers, Fashion Nova’s website contains customer reviews rating its products on a five-star scale. Shoppers visiting the website viewed individual reviews for each product, as well as the average star rating the product received and a graph breaking down the number of reviews received for each product by star rating. But, the FTC alleges, negative reviews were not displayed on the website and not reflected in overall star ratings.

So how did Fashion Nova pull off this disappearing act? According to the complaint, Fashion Nova installed a third-party review management interface that allowed it to automatically post certain reviews while withholding other reviews for its approval prior to posting. The FTC alleges that, from 2015 to 2019, Fashion Nova used this feature to automatically publish four-and five-star reviews while not posting any of the hundreds of thousands of reviews that got below four stars.

The complaint charges that Fashion Nova misrepresented that the reviews on its website accurately reflected the views of all purchasers who submitted reviews to the website. The proposed settlement puts provisions in place to address Fashion Nova’s deceptive practice and orders Fashion Nova to pay $4.2 million for harm consumers incurred.

Fashion Nova has now agreed to post product reviews regardless of whether they are positive or negative. The proposed settlement recognizes certain legitimate reasons for not posting reviews, such as when they contain obscene, sexually explicit, racist, or unlawful content, but those criteria must be applied to all reviews equally, regardless of the opinion expressed. Fashion Nova is also not required to post product reviews unrelated to its products or customer service (which includes shipping and returns). The proposed settlement also prohibits Fashion Nova from making any misrepresentations about product reviews or endorsements. Once the settlement is published in the Federal Register, the FTC will accept public comments for 30 days.

Review suppression is not the only customer review sleight of hand on the FTC’s radar. The FTC announced it is also sending letters to ten companies that offer review management services, warning them to not take improper steps to avoid collecting or publishing negative reviews.

What can online retailers and review management companies take from these actions?

Treat reviews equally. Post all genuine reviews regardless of whether the opinion is positive or negative. In addition, if your company has review moderation policies, ensure the policy is implemented uniformly, regardless of the opinion expressed. Don’t treat negative reviews with more scrutiny.

Solicit reviews neutrally. Soliciting reviews should be a genuine attempt to collect all honest opinions. Don’t ask for reviews only from those likely to leave positive ones or discourage submission of negative reviews.

Outsource review management responsibly. Review and reputation management companies may offer promises of increasing your customer reviews and ratings. Make sure you understand what they are doing. You can be held responsible for what they do on your behalf.

For more guidance – including newly-released guidance for marketers, websites, and platforms – visit ftc.gov/reviews.

 
 

0 Comments


It is your choice whether to submit a comment. If you do, you must create a user name, or we will not post your comment. The Federal Trade Commission Act authorizes this information collection for purposes of managing online comments. Comments and user names are part of the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) public records system, and user names also are part of the FTC’s computer user records system. We may routinely use these records as described in the FTC’s Privacy Act system notices. For more information on how the FTC handles information that we collect, please read our privacy policy.

The purpose of this blog and its comments section is to inform readers about Federal Trade Commission activity, and share information to help them avoid, report, and recover from fraud, scams, and bad business practices. Your thoughts, ideas, and concerns are welcome, and we encourage comments. But keep in mind, this is a moderated blog. We review all comments before they are posted, and we won’t post comments that don’t comply with our commenting policy. We expect commenters to treat each other and the blog writers with respect.

  • We won’t post off-topic comments, repeated identical comments, or comments that include sales pitches or promotions.
  • We won’t post comments that include vulgar messages, personal attacks by name, or offensive terms that target specific people or groups.
  • We won’t post threats, defamatory statements, or suggestions or encouragement of illegal activity.
  • We won’t post comments that include personal information, like Social Security numbers, account numbers, home addresses, and email addresses. To file a detailed report about a scam, go to ReportFraud.ftc.gov.

We don't edit comments to remove objectionable content, so please ensure that your comment contains none of the above. The comments posted on this blog become part of the public domain. To protect your privacy and the privacy of other people, please do not include personal information. Opinions in comments that appear in this blog belong to the individuals who expressed them. They do not belong to or represent views of the Federal Trade Commission.

More from the Business Blog

Get Business Blog updates