16 CFR Part 310 Telemarketing Sales Rule- Debt Relief Amendments #543670-00136

Submission Number:
543670-00136
Commenter:
Mr. Bernard Weinstein
Organization:
Cox School of Business, Southern Methodist Univeristy
State:
TX
Initiative Name:
16 CFR Part 310 Telemarketing Sales Rule- Debt Relief Amendments
Re: Telemarketing Sales Rule – Debt Relief Rulemaking Forum – Request to Participate November 4, 2009, R411001 Please allow this letter to serve as my request to participate in the November 4, 2009 public forum regarding the above-referenced rule (the “Request”) and Notice of Public Rulemaking regarding the same (“NPRM”). My written comments will follow. As the Associate Director of the Maguire Energy Institute and an Adjunct Professor of Business Economics in the Cox School of Business at SMU in Dallas, I have recently published a study on the debt settlement industry, along with my colleague Terry Clower of the University of North Texas, entitled Debt Settlement: Fulfilling the Need for an Economic Middle Ground. Our study is the first of its kind documenting the consumer benefits of debt settlement, a form of debt relief that offers financially struggling consumers an alternative to filing for bankruptcy. Additionally, a leading settlement industry association, the U.S. Organizations of Bankruptcy Alternatives, published this study, which is now available to the public and to policy makers. I will be including this study in my formal, written submission by October 26. Although more study is needed, I’d like to point your attention specifically to the UK. Since 1986, the United Kingdom has had a standardized and regulated mechanism for assisting debtors who wish to avoid bankruptcy. Settlement companies are licensed by the government to ensure accountability and transparency throughout the debt settlement process. There are best practices across the pond that I am just beginning to model. Therefore, I also would like to request an additional extension of the comment period for a mere 120 days, as well as a corresponding postponement of the November 4, 2009 public forum date. Adding additional time for consideration of the important consumer issues at hand will benefit our economy in the long-run, and considering how timely these issues of debt relief are to consumers, the issue of ensuring consumers have options is of the utmost importance. Key findings of our study include: • The great advantage of debt settlement over the alternatives is consumers can satisfy outstanding obligations while paying less than the full amount of their unpaid balances. • There are several downsides to using credit counseling agencies. Most important, the total amount of consumers’ outstanding debt is not reduced. • Credit counseling agencies receive payments from both consumer and credit card companies. This additional payment, or “kick-back,” from creditors is a percentage of the payments creditors receive from consumers. • Many credit card agencies have been hiking interest rates on outstanding balances, causing debtors to find themselves running faster and faster just to stay in place while the timeframe for paying off creditors is stretched out. Hence, some consumers will drop out of credit counseling and simply declare bankruptcy. • As with credit counseling, debt consolidation does not reduce the total amount outstanding. A consolidation loan probably isn’t a viable option for most households with high levels of difficult-to-service debt obligations because these consumers lack a decent credit rating for home equity loan access. • Debt settlement can be viewed as part of the healing process to get distressed U.S. households back on a sound financial footing and thereby improve the odds for a sustainable economic recovery in the years ahead. Brief Bio - Dr. Bernard L. Weinstein, Ph.D., is the Associate Director of the Maguire Energy Institute and an Adjunct Professor of Business Economics in the Cox School of Business at SMU. His work has appeared in professional journals and national publications such as The New York Times, and The Wall St. Journal. Dr. Weinstein has worked for several federal government agencies, including the Federal Trade Commission’s Bureau of Economics. Sincerely, Dr. Bernard Weinstein