"Protecting Consumers in Debt Collection Litigation and Arbitration: A Roundtable Discussion" - August 5 and 6, 2009 #542930-00026

Submission Number:
542930-00026
Commenter:
Attorney Wu Attorney Reynolds
Organization:
Reference FTC Special Project P094806
State:
DC
Initiative Name:
"Protecting Consumers in Debt Collection Litigation and Arbitration: A Roundtable Discussion" - August 5 and 6, 2009

FTC-Special Project Comment--P094806 7/31/2009 5pm Yes our legal eagles angels law network -includes all licensed legal professionals without conflicts of interest, lving and leading by example and we appreciate Maryellen Reynolds, Attorney Owens/Parkman/Kim(excellent ethical lawyers) -serves as legal professionals (without conflicts of interest)..We all agreee Reynolds as an Advocate for Justice, tells it like it is. In our research and development and consulting with Federal Bankruptcy Judges and Lawyers shows evidence against pre-dispute consumer arbitration as not fair/equal for minority persons those most likely to be unfairly targeted for unfair debt collection practices. Administration of Justice: regulation and monitoring include pre post service of process, hearing and judment stages. Case law: statue of limitations are undefined on certain consumer debts which should monitored regulation via Court ie. Administration of Justice.