| Comment Number: | OL-103233 |
| Received: | 11/28/2004 9:21:21 AM |
| Organization: | |
| Commenter: | Freel |
| State: | MA |
| Subject: | Trade Regulation Rule on Telemarketing Sales |
| Title: | Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, Request for Comment |
| CFR Citation: | 16 CFR Part 310 |
| No Attachments |
Comments:
Okay, give me a freaking break please... These telemarketers need to just let it go. We don't want them calling us at all period! That's why we put our names on the national no-call list. If I put my name on the national no call list, what in the name of christ makes you think that I would want to be interrupted with pre-recorded calls?!? It's bewildering. And here's another wake up call for the FTC. I don't care if I have an existing relationship with the company or not; when I put my name on the no-call list, it means no soliciting calls from ANY business. As for the per-day vs. per-month wording regarding the 3% calls received ceiling (and without getting into my opinions on how the ceiling should be ZERO percent), I believe that the wording should remain per-day. If it is changed to per-month I would fear a week or so of constant calls spaced by several weeks of no call activity.