| Comment Number: | OL-101978 |
| Received: | 11/27/2004 8:13:50 PM |
| Organization: | |
| Commenter: | Christopher Warner |
| State: | NY |
| Subject: | Trade Regulation Rule on Telemarketing Sales |
| Title: | Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, Request for Comment |
| CFR Citation: | 16 CFR Part 310 |
| No Attachments |
Comments:
What part of Do-Not-Call is unambiguous? It doesn't say Do-Not-Call-Except-it's-ok-to-call. It says DO, NOT, CALL. Don't Call. When someone specifically ask that you do not call them. You do not call them. Business, personal or otherwise. Should you call regardless of that persons explicit DO NOT CALL request. You're more than likely going to lose their business, not retain it. So please; if the DO-NOT-CALL list becomes a DO-NOT-CALL-BUT-ITS-OK-TO-CALL list.. Take everyone off; Why bother having one? Why are you wasting our money? Why are you lying? I thought people on the DO NOT CALL list already made it clear they don't want calls? What is the problem up there?