<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC '-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN'>

<html><head><title>532047-00019.htm</title>

<meta name='vs_defaultClientScript' content='JavaScript'>

<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">

<meta name='vs_targetSchema' content='http://schemas.microsoft.com/intellisense/ie3-2nav3-0'>

<meta name='Originator' content='CommentWorks'></head><body><Table>

<tr><td><b>Comment Number: </b></td><td>532047-00019</td></tr>

<tr><td><b>Received: </b></td><td>10/4/2007 10:44:51 AM</td></tr>

<tr><td><b>Organization: </b></td><td>Flooring Unlimited</td></tr>

<tr><td><b>Commenter: </b></td><td>Brandon Cornwell</td></tr>

<tr><td><b>State: </b></td><td>GA</td></tr>

<tr><td><b>Agency: </b></td><td>Federal Trade Commission</td></tr>

<tr><td><b>Rule: </b></td><td>Rules and Regulations Under The Textile Fiber Products Identification Act</td></tr>

<tr><td>No Attachments</td></tr></Table>

<hr><P><b>Comments:</b></p>Thank you for your consideration regarding this matter.  We feel that PTT fiber is far superior to that of traditional PET polyester and does not deserve to be classified as such.  The polyester name carries a specific stigma based on past performance issues; therefore, PTT fiber is misrepresented in performance and durability.  PTT fiber has been proven to outperform PET polyester and most nylons in similar applications.  Please strongly consider creating a new subclass for this fiber.  Thank You.</body></html>