<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC '-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN'>

<html><head><title>532047-00017.htm</title>

<meta name='vs_defaultClientScript' content='JavaScript'>

<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">

<meta name='vs_targetSchema' content='http://schemas.microsoft.com/intellisense/ie3-2nav3-0'>

<meta name='Originator' content='CommentWorks'></head><body><Table>

<tr><td><b>Comment Number: </b></td><td>532047-00017</td></tr>

<tr><td><b>Received: </b></td><td>10/3/2007 10:29:02 AM</td></tr>

<tr><td><b>Organization: </b></td><td></td></tr>

<tr><td><b>Commenter: </b></td><td>Hope Holt</td></tr>

<tr><td><b>State: </b></td><td>GA</td></tr>

<tr><td><b>Agency: </b></td><td>Federal Trade Commission</td></tr>

<tr><td><b>Rule: </b></td><td>Rules and Regulations Under The Textile Fiber Products Identification Act</td></tr>

<tr><td>No Attachments</td></tr></Table>

<hr><P><b>Comments:</b></p>We strongly feel that PTT fiber should have its own subclass.  Not only does the polyester name deter consumers from purchasing products using PTT fiber, but traditional PET polyester is noticeably inferior in performance and durability when compared to PTT fiber.  We feel that by creating a new subclass for this fiber, confidence will be instilled in retailers to sell products using PTT fiber and consumers can be assured of the quality in which they are investing.  Thanks for your consideration.</body></html>