<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC '-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN'>

<html><head><title>532047-00006.htm</title>

<meta name='vs_defaultClientScript' content='JavaScript'>

<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">

<meta name='vs_targetSchema' content='http://schemas.microsoft.com/intellisense/ie3-2nav3-0'>

<meta name='Originator' content='CommentWorks'></head><body><Table>

<tr><td><b>Comment Number: </b></td><td>532047-00006</td></tr>

<tr><td><b>Received: </b></td><td>9/26/2007 3:35:08 PM</td></tr>

<tr><td><b>Organization: </b></td><td>Southern Tile and Carpet</td></tr>

<tr><td><b>Commenter: </b></td><td>Amy Allison</td></tr>

<tr><td><b>State: </b></td><td>GA</td></tr>

<tr><td><b>Agency: </b></td><td>Federal Trade Commission</td></tr>

<tr><td><b>Rule: </b></td><td>Rules and Regulations Under The Textile Fiber Products Identification Act</td></tr>

<tr><td>No Attachments</td></tr></Table>

<hr><P><b>Comments:</b></p>PTT fiber is a better product than what people traditionally think of as polyester since PET historically has not had a good wear characteristics. If called polyester, it is misleading to the consumer and the dealer as to how good the product really is.The product performs so much than PET that it should be allowed a new name. Prior experienc with PET had jaded dealers and caused them to not want to sell anything called  a polyester.PTT had much better perfomance that PET, to set hte same name will limit the consumer's ability to purchase the product.</body></html>