|Received:||6/15/2005 10:59:30 AM|
|Organization:||City of Scottsboro|
|Agency:||Federal Trade Commission|
|Rule:||Definitions, Implementation, and Reporting Requirements Under the CAN-SPAM Act|
Comments:I applaud the proposed redefinition of terms to close present loopholes in the CAN-SPAM Act. The proposed act needs to include this provision: "The sender MUST include his/her working email address in any outgoing email and provide a simple working method to promptly remove the receiver's email address." I have been subjected to additional harassment in long, multiple step, time consuming removal processes that were never meant to work, and that require additional information that the "sender" then accumulates. and uses or sells. (Examples can be provided) He/she/it needs to have an accounting by being able to provide to the accountable government agency suitable records of these emails received and the actions taken for a defined period of retention. Thank you for your consideration.