| Comment Number: | OL-102858 |
| Received: | 4/14/2004 12:45:59 PM |
| Organization: | |
| Commenter: | Sweazy |
| State: | CO |
| Agency: | Federal Trade Commission |
| Rule: | CAN-SPAM ANPR |
| Docket ID: | [3084-AA96] |
| No Attachments |
Comments:
A. 3. Commercial advertisement or promotion, If it is not pure informatiom without invitation, it is advertisement! E. 2. As a friend it is your responsibility to respect your friends wishes to send or not send attched files, advertisment or commercial e-mail! You can not hold a company responsible. Re: CAN-SPAM Act Rulemaking, Project No. R411008 To the Commissioners, I applaud your efforts to curb the problem of unsolicited bulk email. However, I am concerned about the proposed requirement for merchants to maintain suppression lists. There are so many problems and costs associated with this idea, and so much damage done to consumers and businesses alike, that I feel I must urge you to consider this matter most carefully. Requirement of the use of suppression lists will seriously damage many of the legitimate publications available on the net. My specific concern is for harm to publishers who require permission from the consumer prior to adding them to any list. They're not who CAN-SPAM was designed to put out of business, but this requirement will very likely have that effect. There's also the potential for significant harm to consumers, because of the problem of properly knowing their intent when they unsubscribe from a list. On top of that, these suppression lists could easily fall into the hands of spammers, leading to more spam instead of less. Ther is ways to stop SPAM without hurting the honest business that has been invited into my life. Please find a way I ppersonnaly do not want to go through all the trouble that you are suggesting. Please look very carefull at this problem. I am a customer not a business and I HATE SPAM. I was quite surprised at the potential problems this ruling could involve, and urge you in the strongest possible terms to reconsider its implementation in light of these problems, Thank You, Edward A Sweazy Colorado Springs. Co. USA